Vitality Bowls vs KUMA ANI
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Vitality Bowls and KUMA ANI are quick-service restaurants franchises. Vitality Bowls requires an investment of $209K – $683K while KUMA ANI requires $345K – $544K. Vitality Bowls discloses average revenue of $592K; KUMA ANI does not report Item 19 data. Vitality Bowls has SBA lending data on file with a 10.0% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Vitality Bowls B (Above average) and KUMA ANI C (Average).
| Metric | Vitality Bowls | KUMA ANI |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove averageAbove average | CAverageAverage |
| Investment Range | $209K – $683K | $345K – $544K |
| Franchise Fee | $40K | $25K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 5.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $592K | N/ACompany-owned only · n=2 |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 10.0% (40 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 70 | 2 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2014 | 2023 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
Investment Range
$209K – $683K
$345K – $544K
Franchise Fee
$40K
$25K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
5.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$592K
N/ACompany-owned only · n=2
SBA Charge-Off Rate
10.0% (40 loans)
N/A
Total Units
70
2
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2014
2023
FDD Year
2025
2025