Tim Ho Wan vs IHOP
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Tim Ho Wan and IHOP are full-service restaurants franchises. Tim Ho Wan requires an investment of $3.2M – $3.8M while IHOP requires $2.7M – $4.2M. IHOP has SBA lending data on file with a 7.3% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Tim Ho Wan B (Above average) and IHOP A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | Tim Ho Wan | IHOP |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove averageAbove average | AStrongest tierStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $3.2M – $3.8M | $2.7M – $4.2M |
| Franchise Fee | $86K | $50K |
| Royalty Rate | 3.0% | 4.5% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/A | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | 7.3% (299 loans) |
| Total Units | 6 | 1,693 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2020 | 2014 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$3.2M – $3.8M
$2.7M – $4.2M
Franchise Fee
$86K
$50K
Royalty Rate
3.0%
4.5%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/A
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
7.3% (299 loans)
Total Units
6
1,693
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2020
2014
FDD Year
2025
2026