SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) vs MOSQUITO SHIELD
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) and MOSQUITO SHIELD are home services franchises. SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) requires an investment of $89K – $191K while MOSQUITO SHIELD requires $121K – $158K. In terms of revenue, MOSQUITO SHIELD reports higher average unit revenue at $286K. MOSQUITO SHIELD has SBA lending data on file with a 7.7% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) D (Below Average) and MOSQUITO SHIELD A (Top Quintile).
| Metric | SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) | MOSQUITO SHIELD |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | DBelow AverageBelow Average | ATop QuintileTop Quintile |
| Investment Range | $89K – $191K | $121K – $158K |
| Franchise Fee | $10K | $55K |
| Royalty Rate | 0.3% | 8.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $147K | $286K |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | 7.7% (63 loans) |
| Total Units | 5 | 435 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2024 | 2013 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp)
DBelow AverageBelow Average
MOSQUITO SHIELD
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
Investment Range
$89K – $191K
$121K – $158K
Franchise Fee
$10K
$55K
Royalty Rate
0.3%
8.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$147K
$286K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
7.7% (63 loans)
Total Units
5
435
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2024
2013
FDD Year
2025
2025