Spitz vs SUKI HANA
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Spitz and SUKI HANA are quick-service restaurants franchises. Spitz requires an investment of $579K – $1.2M while SUKI HANA requires $295K – $1.4M. Spitz discloses average revenue of $1.8M; SUKI HANA makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. FranchiseVerdict rates Spitz A (Strongest tier) and SUKI HANA B (Above average).
| Metric | Spitz | SUKI HANA |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | AStrongest tier | BAbove average |
| Investment Range | $579K – $1.2M | $295K – $1.4M |
| Franchise Fee | $35K | $30K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.5% | 5.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $1.8M | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | Limited data | N/A |
| Total Units | 25 | 39 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +5 units | +2 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2013 | 2000 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$579K – $1.2M
$295K – $1.4M
Franchise Fee
$35K
$30K
Royalty Rate
5.5%
5.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$1.8M
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited data
N/A
Total Units
25
39
Unit Growth (YoY)
+5 units
+2 units
Year Began Franchising
2013
2000
FDD Year
2025
2026