Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) vs Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) and Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems are food retail franchises. Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) requires an investment of $45K – $364K while Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems requires $113K – $172K. Neither Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) nor Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD — a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule — so the two cannot be compared on disclosed unit revenue. FranchiseVerdict rates Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) B (Above average) and Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems B (Above average).
| Metric | Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) | Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | BAbove average |
| Investment Range | $45K – $364K | $113K – $172K |
| Franchise Fee | $30K | $60K |
| Royalty Rate | No royalty is charged. Franchisor derives revenue from wholesale markup on Products sold on credit to Distributors (bona fide wholesale prices with a profit margin). | 7.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | N/A |
| Total Units | 460 | 19 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | -2 units | +0 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2011 | 2024 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2024 |
Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt)
BAbove average
Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems
BAbove average
Investment Range
$45K – $364K
$113K – $172K
Franchise Fee
$30K
$60K
Royalty Rate
No royalty is charged. Franchisor derives revenue from wholesale markup on Products sold on credit to Distributors (bona fide wholesale prices with a profit margin).
7.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
N/A
Total Units
460
19
Unit Growth (YoY)
-2 units
+0 units
Year Began Franchising
2011
2024
FDD Year
2025
2024