OsteoStrong vs Training Mate
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both OsteoStrong and Training Mate are health & fitness franchises. OsteoStrong requires an investment of $276K – $616K while Training Mate requires $320K – $605K. Training Mate discloses average revenue of $612K; OsteoStrong makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. OsteoStrong has SBA lending data on file with a 8.7% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates OsteoStrong B (Above average) and Training Mate B (Above average).
| Metric | OsteoStrong | Training Mate |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | BAbove average |
| Investment Range | $276K – $616K | $320K – $605K |
| Franchise Fee | $35K | $50K |
| Royalty Rate | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | $612K |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 8.7% (55 loans) | Limited data |
| Total Units | 153 | 11 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +10 units | +4 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2012 | 2022 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$276K – $616K
$320K – $605K
Franchise Fee
$35K
$50K
Royalty Rate
7.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
$612K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
8.7% (55 loans)
Limited data
Total Units
153
11
Unit Growth (YoY)
+10 units
+4 units
Year Began Franchising
2012
2022
FDD Year
2025
2026