Merle Norman Cosmetic Studio vs Aussie Pet Mobile
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Merle Norman Cosmetic Studio and Aussie Pet Mobile are personal care & beauty franchises. Merle Norman Cosmetic Studio requires an investment of $129K – $260K while Aussie Pet Mobile requires $167K – $209K. Aussie Pet Mobile discloses average revenue of $314K; Merle Norman Cosmetic Studio makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. Note: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures; Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Aussie Pet Mobile has SBA lending data on file with a 27.3% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Merle Norman Cosmetic Studio B (Above average) and Aussie Pet Mobile C (Average).
| Metric | Merle Norman Cosmetic Studio | Aussie Pet Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $129K – $260K | $167K – $209K |
| Franchise Fee | N/A | $20K |
| Royalty Rate | No royalty fee. Franchisees purchase MN Products at wholesale prices and resell at retail; no percentage of gross sales is paid to MNC. | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | $314KPer franchisee, not per outlet · Outlet subset |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | 27.3% (15 loans) |
| Total Units | 797 | 167 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | -34 units | +56 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 1934 | 1999 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2026 |