Costa Oil vs No-H2O
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Costa Oil and No-H2O are automotive franchises. Costa Oil requires an investment of $132K – $213K while No-H2O requires $135K – $163K. Costa Oil discloses average revenue of $453K; No-H2O makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. Note: Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance. FranchiseVerdict rates Costa Oil C (Average) and No-H2O C (Average).
| Metric | Costa Oil | No-H2O |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | CAverage | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $132K – $213K | $135K – $163K |
| Franchise Fee | $55K | $50K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.5% | 8.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $453KCompany-owned only | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | Limited data | Limited data |
| Total Units | 13 | 6 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +0 units | +0 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2022 | 2018 |
| FDD Year | 2022 | 2022 |
Investment Range
$132K – $213K
$135K – $163K
Franchise Fee
$55K
$50K
Royalty Rate
6.5%
8.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$453KCompany-owned only
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited data
Limited data
Total Units
13
6
Unit Growth (YoY)
+0 units
+0 units
Year Began Franchising
2022
2018
FDD Year
2022
2022