Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems vs Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt)
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems and Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) are food retail franchises. Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems requires an investment of $113K – $172K while Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) requires $45K – $364K. Neither Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems nor Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD — a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule — so the two cannot be compared on disclosed unit revenue. FranchiseVerdict rates Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems B (Above average) and Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) B (Above average).
| Metric | Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems | Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt) |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | BAbove average |
| Investment Range | $113K – $172K | $45K – $364K |
| Franchise Fee | $60K | $30K |
| Royalty Rate | 7.0% | No royalty is charged. Franchisor derives revenue from wholesale markup on Products sold on credit to Distributors (bona fide wholesale prices with a profit margin). |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | N/A | N/A |
| Total Units | 19 | 460 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +0 units | -2 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2024 | 2011 |
| FDD Year | 2024 | 2025 |
Aqua Chill Drinking Water Systems
BAbove average
Schmidt Baking Distribution (dba Schmidt)
BAbove average
Investment Range
$113K – $172K
$45K – $364K
Franchise Fee
$60K
$30K
Royalty Rate
7.0%
No royalty is charged. Franchisor derives revenue from wholesale markup on Products sold on credit to Distributors (bona fide wholesale prices with a profit margin).
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
N/A
N/A
Total Units
19
460
Unit Growth (YoY)
+0 units
-2 units
Year Began Franchising
2024
2011
FDD Year
2024
2025