Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Verlo Mattress logo
FV-02886FDD 2026Data Quality·Excellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Verlo Mattress Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

RetailWisconsinFranchising since 1989CEODavid MarcusWebsite Report an errorFranchisor? Claim this listing

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

BAbove average54/100

Verlo Mattress is a mattress retail franchise that builds and sells custom mattresses in its own factory-direct stores. Franchisees run the stores, managing assembly, retail sales, and customer service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Verlo Mattress franchise requires a total initial investment of $299K – $751K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $1.3M — this franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 11 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Data last verified · figures per the 2026 FDD issuance

Overview

Investment
$299K – $751K
34th pct Retail
Avg gross sales
$1.3M
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subsetNet sales
Royalty
5.0%
6th pct Retail
Units
36
16th pct Retail
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Retail · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$299K – $751K
Avg $412K
above avg ↑
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Avg $35K
Liquid Capital Req'd
$18K – $96K
Avg $50K
Avg Revenue
$1.3M
Avg $920K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subsetNet sales
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Avg 6.2%
Ongoing Fees
7.5% of rev
Avg 9.0%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
Avg 17.9%
below avg ↓
System Size
36 units
Avg 407 units
Turnover Rate
N/A
Avg 8.1%
Territory
Protected
Exclusive zone granted
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Retail avg · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $299K – $751K including a $50K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $1.3M/year (median $996K) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 54/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 11 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 17.9% CAGR over 3 years with 36 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
FWR, LLC d/b/a Verlo Mattress
Parent company
FWR Holdings, LLC
Predecessor
Verlo Mattress Company; Verlo Mattress Company, Inc.; Verlo Mattress Factory Stores, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President
David Marcus
Incorporated in
Wisconsin
HQ
301 N. Broadway Street, Suite 300, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Auditor
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$3.1M
vs $2.5M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
David Marcus
Headquarters
Wisconsin
FDD year
2026
States available
7

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 27% above the typical retail franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$299K – $751KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty + ad fund5.0% + 2.5%
Working capital$18K – $96K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Verlo Mattress: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$18K$96K
Equipment, build-out, other$231K$605K
Total initial investment$299K$751K

Source: Verlo Mattress 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$299K – $751K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$18K – $96K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.5%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Verlo Mattress: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.5% of gross sales
Technology fee$500
Training fee$6K
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$89K $102K
Total fee load7.5% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 46% above the retail norm.

Avg gross sales$1.3M

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$996KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet sales
Sample size14 franchisees

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Verlo Mattress until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$582K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Verlo Mattress unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,339,011 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC. — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 68%
typ 35%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $299K–$751K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $18K–$96K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
EBITDA margin
Total invested
$582K
Payback
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$1.3M
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$996K
Per franchisee, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net sales
Sample size
14 franchisees
vs category median 46 · small
Range (low → high)
$188K$3.1M
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2023
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2023
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank34th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank6th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank16th
vs Retail peers
Risk score rank32th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 278 Retail brands

Showing the headline figures — all 146 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $1.3M/year in gross sales. Median is $996K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.5% — below the Retail average of 9.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 17.9% CAGR over 3 years across 36 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Retail averages

How Verlo Mattress Compares

Metric
Verlo Mattress
Category Avg
vs Avg
Investment
$525K
$412K
Revenue
$1.3M
$920K

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category average is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
36
406.738

Is the system healthy?

Total units36Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
3-yr growth+17.9%

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
36
Opened
5
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
6
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
85%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+17.9%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+17.9%
Compounded over last 3 years

3-year detail · Item 20

Opened (3yr)
5
Closed (3yr)
0
Terminated (3yr)
0
Non-renewed (3yr)
0
Transfers (3yr)
2
Reacquired (3yr)
0
Franchisor bought back
2023
28
Franchised units
2024
36+8
Franchised units
2025
30-6
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 6 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 6 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
11
Loan volume
$6.1M
Median loan
$603K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
6
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
10.6%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
0.0%
brand is above its industry ↑
Jobs supported
62
1.0 per loan
Lender concentration
45%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 82% went to startups / new businesses, 18% to established operators

Top lenders financing Verlo Mattress franchisees

The Huntington National Bank5 loans
First Bank of the Lake2 loans
Summit State Bank1 loans

Showing 3 of 6 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$578K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
2

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Premium insight

SBA Lending Report

Deep-dive into Verlo Mattress's SBA lending history: lender network, geographic footprint, interest rates, and more.

SBA Lending Report

  • Principal loss rate and NAICS industry benchmark
  • 6 lenders with concentration factor
  • Per-state charge-off rates across 6 states
  • Startup risk premium and job creation velocity
  • 4-year lending trend
  • SBA 504 real estate/equipment data
$29 one-time

Instant access. No subscription.

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 11 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0%
Verdict score54/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Going concernClear

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average54Verdict score 54/100
High confidence±3 pts
5460

Litigation (Item 3)

Four disclosed cases as of Item 3: (1) MKD Investment Holdings, LLC v. FWR, LLC (AAA arbitration, filed Dec. 2024) alleging misrepresentation in the FDD, seeking rescission and $2M damages; Verlo counterclaimed; (2) The Marcus Corporation, et al. v. MKD Investment Holdings, LLC (E.D. Wis. declaratory judgment action re: arbitrability, filed Aug. 2025), with MKD counterclaiming; (3) North Shore Z's LLC v. FWR, LLC (AAA arbitration, filed May 2025) alleging misrepresentation, seeking rescission and $700,000 damages, with Verlo counterclaiming; final hearing scheduled Sept. 2026; (4) NN3 BP Associates, LLC v. Noble Ventures 317, LLC, et al. (Indiana state court, landlord breach-of-lease action) in which the franchisee cross-claimed against Verlo alleging FDD misrepresentation; Verlo's motion to compel arbitration was granted.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $3.1MYr 2: $2.5MNon-royalty: $0.8M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 54 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORThin net worth $108,359
  2. 02MINORFinancial distress flag
  3. 03MINORNo litigation or bankruptcy

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 146 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNot exclusive
Initial training140 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeprotected
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryNo
Territory radius4 mi
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)2 years
Non-compete (miles)100 mi
Right of first refusalYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice90 days
Curable defaults3
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMadison, Wisconsin
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawWisconsin
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

Four disclosed cases as of Item 3: (1) MKD Investment Holdings, LLC v. FWR, LLC (AAA arbitration, filed Dec. 2024) alleging misrepresentation in the FDD, seeking rescission and $2M damages; Verlo counterclaimed; (2) The Marcus Corporation, et al. v. MKD Investment Holdings, LLC (E.D. Wis. declaratory judgment action re: arbitrability, filed Aug. 2025), with MKD counterclaiming; (3) North Shore Z's LLC v. FWR, LLC (AAA arbitration, filed May 2025) alleging misrepresentation, seeking rescission and $700,000 damages, with Verlo counterclaiming; final hearing scheduled Sept. 2026; (4) NN3 BP Associates, LLC v. Noble Ventures 317, LLC, et al. (Indiana state court, landlord breach-of-lease action) in which the franchisee cross-claimed against Verlo alleging FDD misrepresentation; Verlo's motion to compel arbitration was granted.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
112 hrs
On-the-job training
28 hrs
Training location
Greenfield, Wisconsin (or another site/platform as designated; may be in-person or remote)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

Site selection assistance
Grand opening support
Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

26 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 26 contacts · $49
Free preview
920-929-••••WI
Unlock all 26 contacts
920-743-••••WI
346-552-••••TX
920-457-••••WI
920-231-••••WI

FDD download

Verlo Mattress · FDD (2026) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Verlo Mattress franchise?

The total investment to open a Verlo Mattress franchise ranges from $299K – $751K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Verlo Mattress franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Verlo Mattress FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.3M. The median is $996K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures; Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system; Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

What is Item 19 in the Verlo Mattress FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Verlo Mattress FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Verlo Mattress's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Verlo Mattress has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 11 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Verlo Mattress franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Verlo Mattress has 36 total units in the United States, including 30 franchised units and 6 company-owned units. 5 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Verlo Mattress a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Verlo Mattress as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 54 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Verlo Mattress, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Retail franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Retail category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.