Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Wok to Walk logoBAbove average
Wok to Walk
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Frylicious logoCAverage
Frylicious
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
2025 FDD
FDD issued Sep 10, 2025
Investment range
$346K – $824K
$80K – $1.1M
Liquid capital
$11K – $20K
$2K – $2K
Franchise fee
$30K
$30K
Royalty rate
6.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
0.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
No Item 19 representation
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
CAverage
Verdict score
54 / 100
39 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
Not SBA-matched
SBA loans on record
N/A
N/A
Scale
Total units
6
1
Net change (latest yr)
0
0
Signed, not yet open
Not extracted
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
Not extracted
10
Initial training (hrs)
264
63
Contacts
Franchisee phones
0
1

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Wok to Walk vs Frylicious editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →