Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Sweet Chick Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Ivan Ramen Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $1.1M – $1.8M | $1.0M – $2.0M |
Liquid capital | $70K – $80K | $150K – $300K |
Franchise fee | $40K | $35K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 3.0% | 1.5% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $3.2M | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | DBelow Average | FBottom Quintile |
Risk score | 72 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 6 | 1 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 112 | 106 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 10 | 3 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Sweet Chick vs Ivan Ramen editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →