Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
SNAP FITNESS logoCAverage
SNAP FITNESS
Health & Fitness
2025 FDD
 Remove
Safari Run logoCAverage
Safari Run
Health & Fitness
2025 FDD
 Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued May 23, 2025
FDD issued Jun 5, 2025
Investment range
$431K – $1.1M
$429K – $1.1M
Liquid capital
$25K – $50K
$40K – $60K
Franchise fee
$40K
$40K
Royalty rate
Not extracted
6.0%
Ad fund rate
Not extracted
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$250K
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
$215K
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
P&L Bottom Line
Not classified
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
45 / 100
45 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
11.6% (n=265)
Not SBA-matched
SBA loans on record
265
N/A
Scale
Total units
493
3
Net change (latest yr)
-26
0
Signed, not yet open
11 (0.02 per open outlet)
Not extracted
Turnover rate
6.5%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
5
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
50
102
Contacts
Franchisee phones
495
5

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the SNAP FITNESS vs Safari Run editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →