Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Safari Run Health & Fitness Remove | Bünda Health & Fitness Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $429K – $1.1M | $623K – $1.0M |
Liquid capital | $40K – $60K | $10K – $20K |
Franchise fee | $40K | $50K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 47 / 100 | 62 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 3 | 19 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 102 | 80 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 6 | 9 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Safari Run vs Bünda editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →