Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Red Mango logoDBelow average
Red Mango
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Hungry Howie's logoBAbove average
Hungry Howie's
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 3, 2025
2025 FDD
Investment range
$323K – $557K
$359K – $519K
Liquid capital
$10K – $20K
$2K – $20K
Franchise fee
$30K
$25K
Royalty rate
6.0%
5.5%
Ad fund rate
3.0%
7.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
Partial, no system averageOutlets $4K-$1.1M
$794K
Median gross sales
Not extracted
$750K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
DBelow average
BAbove average
Verdict score
30 / 100
56 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
30.8% (n=14)
17.9% (n=120)
SBA loans on record
14
120
Scale
Total units
45
509
Net change (latest yr)
-5
-9
Signed, not yet open
Not extracted
15 (0.03 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
15.6%
2.6%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
5
10
Initial training (hrs)
48
250
Contacts
Franchisee phones
39
520

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Red Mango vs Hungry Howie's editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →