Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Port of Subs logoBAbove average
Port of Subs
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Skrimp Shack logoCAverage
Skrimp Shack
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Apr 24, 2025
FDD issued May 1, 2025
Investment range
$420K – $857K
$329K – $948K
Liquid capital
$15K – $25K
$10K – $15K
Franchise fee
$25K
$35K
Royalty rate
6.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
1.0%
1.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$552K
$804K
Median gross sales
$512K
$770K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
CAverage
Verdict score
56 / 100
44 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
15.7% (n=61)
Under 10 loans (7)
SBA loans on record
61
7
Scale
Total units
126
19
Net change (latest yr)
+5
-2
Signed, not yet open
11 (0.09 per open outlet)
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
2.4%
10.5%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
5
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
223
365
Contacts
Franchisee phones
15
14

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Port of Subs vs Skrimp Shack editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →