Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Pekoe Tea Bar logoBAbove average
Pekoe Tea Bar
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Teriyaki Madness logoCAverage
Teriyaki Madness
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued Mar 4, 2025
FDD issued Mar 18, 2025
Investment range
$496K – $855K
$376K – $976K
Liquid capital
$25K – $50K
$10K – $30K
Franchise fee
$40K
$45K
Royalty rate
6.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
3.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
No Item 19 representation
$1.2M
Median gross sales
Not disclosed
$1.1M
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not disclosed
$86K
Earnings metric
Not classified
EBITDA $85,690 / 8%
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
CAverage
Verdict score
49 / 100
40 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Not SBA-matched
25.0% (n=127)
SBA loans on record
N/A
127
Scale
Total units
5
158
Net change (latest yr)
0
+18
Signed, not yet open
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Not extracted
Turnover rate
0.0%
10.8%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
5
Initial training (hrs)
40
30
Contacts
Franchisee phones
1
208

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Pekoe Tea Bar vs Teriyaki Madness editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →