Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Juici Patties logoCAverage
Juici Patties
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
NAMKEEN logoCAverage
NAMKEEN
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
2025 FDD
FDD issued Apr 4, 2025
Investment range
$340K – $569K
$272K – $640K
Liquid capital
$10K – $40K
$20K – $45K
Franchise fee
$45K
$35K
Royalty rate
6.0%
6.0%
Ad fund rate
4.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
Partial, no system average
$1.6MCompany-owned only
Median gross sales
Not extracted
$1.6MCompany-owned only
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not extracted
Earnings metric
EBITDA
Not classified
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
41 / 100
43 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Limited · 12 loans
Not SBA-matched
SBA loans on record
12
N/A
Scale
Total units
4
3
Net change (latest yr)
+4
0
Signed, not yet open
24 (6.00 per open outlet)
0 (0.00 per open outlet)
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
5
10
Renewal term (years)
5
10
Initial training (hrs)
168
160
Contacts
Franchisee phones
14
1

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Juici Patties vs NAMKEEN editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →