Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

These brands report different earnings metrics (EBITDA, P&L Bottom Line). Financial figures may not be directly comparable.

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Hydrate IV Bar logoCAverage
Hydrate IV Bar
Healthcare
Remove
easyvet logoCAverage
easyvet
Healthcare
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$242K – $448K
$183K – $513K
Liquid capital
$45K – $75K
$30K – $65K
Franchise fee
$50K
$10K
Royalty rate
8.0%
7.5%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
N/A
Performance
Avg gross sales
$722K
$627K
Median gross sales
$612K
$553K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
$183K
N/A
Earnings metric
EBITDA
P&L Bottom Line
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
44 / 100
44 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
0.0%
N/A
SBA loans on record
7
N/A
Scale
Total units
17
13
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
0.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
10
Initial training (hrs)
58
92
Contacts
Franchisee phones
10
63

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Hydrate IV Bar vs easyvet editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →