Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Cinnaholic logoCAverage
Cinnaholic
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Redstraw logoCAverage
Redstraw
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
2025 FDD
FDD issued Apr 22, 2025
Investment range
$241K – $527K
$277K – $493K
Liquid capital
$15K – $30K
$10K – $20K
Franchise fee
$40K
$45K
Royalty rate
5.0%
5.0%
Ad fund rate
2.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$313K
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
$300K
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not extracted
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
CAverage
CAverage
Verdict score
44 / 100
40 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Limited · 57 loans
Under 10 loans (1)
SBA loans on record
57
1
Scale
Total units
83
4
Net change (latest yr)
+2
0
Signed, not yet open
13 (0.16 per open outlet)
Not extracted
Turnover rate
15.7%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
10
Initial training (hrs)
35
43
Contacts
Franchisee phones
121
2

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Cinnaholic vs Redstraw editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →