Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 5 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Baya Bar logoBAbove average
Baya Bar
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Tomaso’s logoDBelow average
Tomaso’s
Quick-Service Restaurants
2025 FDD
Remove
Vitals
FDD filing
FDD issued May 5, 2025
FDD issued May 9, 2025
Investment range
$161K – $340K
$183K – $319K
Liquid capital
$20K – $45K
$25K – $50K
Franchise fee
$35K
$50K
Royalty rate
6.0%
3.0%
Ad fund rate
1.0%
Not extracted
Performance
Avg gross sales
No Item 19 representation
No Item 19 representation
Median gross sales
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
DBelow average
Verdict score
55 / 100
35 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Not SBA-matched
SBA loans on record
5
N/A
Scale
Total units
28
1
Net change (latest yr)
+2
0
Signed, not yet open
11 (0.39 per open outlet)
Not extracted
Turnover rate
3.6%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
10
Renewal term (years)
10
10
Initial training (hrs)
74
100
Contacts
Franchisee phones
33
0

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Baya Bar vs Tomaso’s editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →