Larks Entertainment vs Cloudbound
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Larks Entertainment and Cloudbound are recreation & entertainment franchises. Larks Entertainment requires an investment of $1.9M – $4.1M while Cloudbound requires $2.3M – $4.2M. Neither Larks Entertainment nor Cloudbound makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD — a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule — so the two cannot be compared on disclosed unit revenue. FranchiseVerdict rates Larks Entertainment D (Below average) and Cloudbound C (Average).
| Metric | Larks Entertainment | Cloudbound |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | DBelow average | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $1.9M – $4.1M | $2.3M – $4.2M |
| Franchise Fee | $40K | $60K |
| Royalty Rate | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/ANo Item 19 representation | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | Limited data | N/A |
| Total Units | 3 | 0 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +1 units | +0 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2022 | 2025 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$1.9M – $4.1M
$2.3M – $4.2M
Franchise Fee
$40K
$60K
Royalty Rate
7.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/ANo Item 19 representation
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited data
N/A
Total Units
3
0
Unit Growth (YoY)
+1 units
+0 units
Year Began Franchising
2022
2025
FDD Year
2025
2026