Altitude Trampoline Park vs Cloudbound
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Altitude Trampoline Park and Cloudbound are recreation & entertainment franchises. Altitude Trampoline Park requires an investment of $2.1M – $3.5M while Cloudbound requires $2.3M – $4.2M. Altitude Trampoline Park discloses average revenue of $2.0M; Cloudbound makes no financial performance representation in its Item 19, which is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule. Altitude Trampoline Park has SBA lending data on file with a 15.8% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates Altitude Trampoline Park B (Above average) and Cloudbound C (Average).
| Metric | Altitude Trampoline Park | Cloudbound |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | BAbove average | CAverage |
| Investment Range | $2.1M – $3.5M | $2.3M – $4.2M |
| Franchise Fee | $65K | $60K |
| Royalty Rate | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $2.0M | N/ANo Item 19 representation |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 15.8% (47 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 81 | 0 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | +2 units | +0 units |
| Year Began Franchising | 2019 | 2025 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2026 |
Investment Range
$2.1M – $3.5M
$2.3M – $4.2M
Franchise Fee
$65K
$60K
Royalty Rate
6.0%
6.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$2.0M
N/ANo Item 19 representation
SBA Charge-Off Rate
15.8% (47 loans)
N/A
Total Units
81
0
Unit Growth (YoY)
+2 units
+0 units
Year Began Franchising
2019
2025
FDD Year
2026
2026