Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Maaco logo
FV-01533FDD 2025Data Quality·Excellent91%
Owner-operator requiredNo: No territory protection

MAACO Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

AutomotiveNCFranchising since 1972CEODaniel RiveraWebsite Report an errorFranchisor? Claim this listing

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

BAbove average56/100

Maaco is an automotive franchise specializing in collision repair and affordable auto painting and bodywork. Franchisees run body shops managing technicians, customer intake, insurance work, and quality control.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Maaco franchise requires a total initial investment of $196K – $644K, including a $45K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.6M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 17.4% charge-off rate across 612 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Data last verified · figures per the 2025 FDD issuance

Overview

Investment
$196K – $644K
27th pct Automotive
Avg gross sales
$1.6M
Outlet subset16th pct Automotive
Royalty
8.0%
40th pct Automotive
Units
363
44th pct Automotive
SBA charge-off
17.4%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Automotive · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$196K – $644K
Avg $876K
below avg ↓
Franchise Fee
$45K – $45K
Avg $33K
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $75K
Avg $77K
Avg Revenue
$1.6M
Avg $1.4M
above avg ↑
Outlet subset
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Avg 7.2%
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Avg 9.4%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
17.4%
Avg 15.8%
above avg ↑
System Size
363 units
Avg 322 units
Turnover Rate
5.2%
Avg 7.8%
Territory
Not protected
Franchisor can open nearby
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
10 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Automotive avg · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $196K – $644K including a $45K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.6M/year (median $1.3M) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 56/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 17.4% across 612 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • LEGAL10 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3, higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC
Parent company
Driven Systems LLC
Ultimate parent
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
Predecessor
MAACO Franchising, LLC (MAA); Maaco Enterprises, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Manager and Chief Executive Officer
Daniel Rivera
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
440 South Church Street, Suite 700, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Auditor
Independent auditor (not named in text extract)
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$270.2M
vs $289.7M prior year

Affiliated brands

  • Driven Brands Shared Services

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Daniel Rivera
Headquarters
NC
Founded
1972
FDD year
2025
States available
45

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 52% below the typical automotive franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$196K – $644KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 39 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$45,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 30 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty + ad fund8.0%
Working capital$50K – $75K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown16 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$45K$45K
Initial Training and Opening Fee (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$10K$10K
Initial Advertising Contribution (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$15K$15K
Living Expenses During Training (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$4K$5K
Equipment, Signage and Initial Computer Hardware (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$33K$307K
Opening Inventory and Supplies (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$15K$37K
Construction, Design, Tenant Improvements and Miscellaneous Start-Up Costs (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$25K$150K
Additional Funds - 3 Months (Auto Body Conversion Center)not refundable$50K$75K
Initial Franchise Fee (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$45K$45K
Initial Training and Opening Fee (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$10K$10K
Initial Advertising Contribution (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$15K$15K
Living Expenses During Training (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$4K$5K
Equipment, Signage and Initial Computer Hardware (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$240K$307K
Opening Inventory and Supplies (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$15K$37K
Construction, Design, Tenant Improvements and Miscellaneous Start-Up Costs (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$350K$3.5M
Additional Funds - 3 Months (Ground Up Center or Non-Auto Retrofit Center)not refundable$50K$75K
Total initial investment$925K$4.6M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$196K – $644K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $75K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$45K – $45K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
$1,200 per week minimum (flat weekly marketing fee; may b…
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Maaco: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$0
Training fee$10K
Transfer fee$3K
Renewal fee$3K
Inventory (initial)$15K $37K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 15% above the automotive norm.

Avg gross sales$1.6M

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 76 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.3MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 76 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross receipts
Sample size317 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Maaco until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$483K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Maaco unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,615,904 per unit — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 68%
typ 35%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $196K–$644K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$75K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
EBITDA margin
Total invested
$483K
Payback
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$1.6M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.3M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross receipts
Sample size
317 outlets
vs category median 70 · large
Range (low → high)
$446K$10.5M
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$1.0M$2.2M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank16th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank27th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank40th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank44th
vs Automotive peers
Risk score rank37th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 167 Automotive brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.6M/year in gross sales. Median is $1.3M — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 3.8x. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Automotive average).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -8.8% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Multi-unit rate

Only 14% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Automotive averages

How MAACO Compares

Metric
MAACO
Category Avg
vs Avg
Investment
$420K
$876K
Revenue
$1.6M
$1.4M
Unit Count
363
322.223

Is the system healthy?

Total units363Verified — printed on page 79 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-8.8%
Turnover rate5.2%

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
363
Opened
6
Last reporting year
Closed
19
Terminated
19
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
5.2%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
13.6%
Net growth (3-yr)
-8.8%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-8.8%
Compounded over last 3 years

3-year detail · Item 20

Opened (3yr)
18
Closed (3yr)
0
Terminated (3yr)
65
Non-renewed (3yr)
1
Transfers (3yr)
51
Reacquired (3yr)
0
Franchisor bought back
Transfer rate
4.4%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
95.0%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
5.2%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
2022
398
Franchised units
2023
376-22
Franchised units
2024
363-13
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 45 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

45

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

D
SBA Lending Health
Below-average SBA lending record · 17.4% charge-off
Total loans
612
Loan volume
$226.5M
Median loan
$408K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
17.4%
rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
82.6%
5-yr charge-off
35.7%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
140
Defaults
76
Typical loan rate
7.7%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.2%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
1,187
2.2 per loan
Lender concentration
14%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 45% went to startups / new businesses, 55% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in automotive body, paint, and interior repair and , franchised businesses charge off at 17.2% vs 13.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 27% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

MAACO charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
MAACO charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 4 vintages from 2018 to 2021. Rates range from 0.0% to 66.7%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%'18'19'20'21

Top lenders financing MAACO franchisees

Live Oak Banking Company11 loans0.0%
The Huntington National Bank5 loans0.0%
The Bancorp Bank National Association4 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 140 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
12
Loan volume
$6.2M
Charge-off rate
0.0%
Jobs created
116

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Premium insight

SBA Lending Report

Deep-dive into MAACO's SBA lending history: lender network, geographic footprint, interest rates, and more.

SBA Lending Report

  • Principal loss rate and NAICS industry benchmark
  • 10 lenders with concentration factor
  • Per-state charge-off rates across 15 states
  • Startup risk premium and job creation velocity
  • 11-year lending trend
  • SBA 504 real estate/equipment data
$29 one-time

Instant access. No subscription.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans here charge off near the 16.0% national average.

SBA charge-off17.4%
Verdict score56/100 (higher is better)
Litigation10 cases
Going concernClear

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average56Verdict score 56/100

Maaco presents high-risk profile with a shrinking franchise system, absent profitability data, unresolved securities litigation, and unprotected territories that threaten franchisee sustainability.

High confidence±3 pts
5258

Litigation (Item 3)

Two franchisor-initiated actions against former franchisees (both concluded/settled). Three pending shareholder derivative/securities class actions against parent Driven Brands Holdings. Three concluded franchisee actions against franchisor/affiliates (including settlement for $5.5M to Maaco from franchisee, $100K paid by MAA to franchisees, $675K paid by MAA). One Canada affiliate action (settled CAN$500K). One Arby's affiliate state AG settlement.

Largest disclosed settlement: $675,000

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Independent auditor (not named in text extract)

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $270.2MYr 2: $289.7M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 21 audited statements are the consolidated financials of parent guarantor Driven Systems LLC (FYE Dec 28, 2024), not the franchisor Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC. Balance-sheet figures are the audited Dec 28, 2024 year-end values (shown as comparatives in the unaudited interim balance sheet, in thousands). Full-year audited statement of operations (revenue, net income) and the CPA auditor report were present in Exhibit A but rendered as unreadable encoded/CID font text in this extract, so annual revenue/net income and auditor name left null. Note: the interim (3-month ended Mar 29, 2025) unaudited statement of operations showed Total revenue $63,575K (franchise fee revenue $60,197K + other revenue $3,378K) and net income $55,614K, but these are quarterly, not annual.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 56 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-3.5% YoY) signals system contraction and market saturation concerns
  2. 02HIGHMultiple active litigations including shareholder derivative and securities class actions create franchisor stability uncertainty
  3. 03MINORNo protected territory combined with 363 competing units increases cannibalization risk
  4. 04MED8% royalty on $1.6M average revenue = $128k annual royalty burden with undisclosed profitability
  5. 05HIGHGoing concern status is FALSE but pending securities litigation suggests financial/operational stress at parent level

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term15 yrs
Renewal term15 yrs
TerritoryNot exclusive
Initial training127 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term15 years
Renewal term15 years
Allowed renewals1
Territory typenone
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryNo
Territory radius10 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Not allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)1 year
Non-compete (miles)10 mi
Right of first refusalYes
RoFR response window90 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination grounds15
Curable defaults3
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationCharlotte, North Carolina (litigation only, no arbitration)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNC
Litigation count10
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two franchisor-initiated actions against former franchisees (both concluded/settled). Three pending shareholder derivative/securities class actions against parent Driven Brands Holdings. Three concluded franchisee actions against franchisor/affiliates (including settlement for $5.5M to Maaco from franchisee, $100K paid by MAA to franchisees, $675K paid by MAA). One Canada affiliate action (settled CAN$500K). One Arby's affiliate state AG settlement.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
127 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Charlotte, North Carolina (and virtually for pre-work)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
18 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
CCC One Base Package
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

Site selection assistance
Grand opening support
Lease negotiation help

Technology: CCC One Base Package

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

28 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 28 contacts · $49
Free preview
704-377-••••
Unlock all 28 contacts
(213) 576-••••
(651) 539-••••
817-447-••••
(362) 902-••••

FDD download

Maaco · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Maaco franchise?

The total investment to open a Maaco franchise ranges from $196K – $644K, with an initial franchise fee of $45K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Maaco franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Maaco FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.6M. The median is $1.3M. Important context: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

What is Item 19 in the Maaco FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Maaco FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Maaco's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Maaco has a charge-off rate of 17.4% across 612 loans, meaning 17.4% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Maaco franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Maaco has 363 total units in the United States, including 363 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 6 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Maaco a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Maaco as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 56 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Maaco, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Automotive franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Automotive category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.