Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Maaco logo
BAbove average51/100FDD 2025

MAACO: Litigation & Risk

Automotive · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Elevated Risk

10 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
10
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
51 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
B
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
612
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
17.4%
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
35.7%
Defaults
76 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$226.5M
Avg loan size
$370K
Participating lenders
140

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
1 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
NC
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

Two franchisor-initiated actions against former franchisees (both concluded/settled). Three pending shareholder derivative/securities class actions against parent Driven Brands Holdings. Three concluded franchisee actions against franchisor/affiliates (including settlement for $5.5M to Maaco from franchisee, $100K paid by MAA to franchisees, $675K paid by MAA). One Canada affiliate action (settled CAN$500K). One Arby's affiliate state AG settlement.

What drove the 51/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-3.5% YoY) signals system contraction and market saturation concerns
  2. 02MINORNo average net income disclosure prevents ROI validation despite $196k-$4M investment range
  3. 03HIGHMultiple active litigations including shareholder derivative and securities class actions create franchisor stability uncertainty
  4. 04MINORNo protected territory combined with 363 competing units increases cannibalization risk
  5. 05MED8% royalty on $1.6M average revenue = $128k annual royalty burden with undisclosed profitability
  6. 06HIGHGoing concern status is FALSE but pending securities litigation suggests financial/operational stress at parent level

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.