Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Kilwins logo
FV-01410FDD 2025Data Quality·Excellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Kilwins Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsMIFranchising since 1981CEOBrian BrittonWebsite Report an errorFranchisor? Claim this listing

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

AStrongest tier75/100

Kilwins is a confectionery franchise selling handmade chocolates, fudge, and its original-recipe ice cream from charming retail shops. Franchisees run stores managing in-store candy and treat production and counter service, often in tourist and downtown districts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Kilwins franchise requires a total initial investment of $513K – $880K, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $933K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 3.6% charge-off rate across 120 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Data last verified · figures per the 2025 FDD issuance

Overview

Investment
$513K – $880K
78th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$933K
17th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.0%
12th pct Service Resta…
Units
172
81st pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
3.6%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$513K – $880K
Avg $664K
near avg
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Avg $34K
Liquid Capital Req'd
$8K – $75K
Avg $44K
Avg Revenue
$933K
Avg $1.2M
below avg ↓
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Avg 5.5%
Ongoing Fees
5.0% of rev
Avg 7.9%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
3.6%
Avg 17.3%
below avg ↓
System Size
172 units
Avg 236 units
Turnover Rate
3.5%
Avg 6.2%
Territory
Protected
Exclusive zone granted
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants avg · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $513K – $880K including a $40K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $933K/year (median $802K).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 75/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 3.6% across 120 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 15.9% CAGR over 3 years with 172 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc.
Parent company
Kilwins MidCo LLC
Ultimate parent
Kilwins TopCo LLC (controlled by Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, LLC)
Predecessor
and Affiliates
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President and Chief Executive Officer
Brian Britton
Incorporated in
MI
HQ
1050 Bay View Road, Petoskey, Michigan 49770
Auditor
Beene Garter, A Doeren Mayhew Firm
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$19.8M
vs $16.4M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Brian Britton
Headquarters
MI
Founded
1981
FDD year
2025
States available
29

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost is about average for a quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$513K – $880KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty + ad fund5.0% + 3.0%
Working capital$8K – $75K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Kilwins: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$40K$40K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$8K$75K
Equipment, build-out, other$465K$765K
Total initial investment$513K$880K

Source: Kilwins 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$513K – $880K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$8K – $75K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
3.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
5.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Kilwins: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund3.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$200
Training fee$20
Transfer fee$30K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$31K $52K
Total fee load5.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 5.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 19% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$933KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$802KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 57 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size128 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Kilwins until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$738K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Kilwins unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $933,138 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 68%
typ 35%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $513K–$880K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $8K–$75K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
EBITDA margin
Total invested
$738K
Payback
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$933K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$802K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
128 outlets
vs category median 18 · large
Range (low → high)
$260K$2.5M
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank17th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank78th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank81th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank9th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 782 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $933K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.3x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 5.0% — below the Quick-Service Restaurants average of 7.9%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 15.9% CAGR over 3 years across 172 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants averages

How Kilwins Compares

Metric
Kilwins
Category Avg
vs Avg
Investment
$697K
$664K
Revenue
$933K
$1.2M
Unit Count
172
236.064

Is the system healthy?

Total units172Verified — printed on page 61 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+15.9%
Turnover rate3.5%

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
172
Opened
15
Last reporting year
Closed
6
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.5%
Company-owned
4
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
98%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+15.9%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+15.9%
Compounded over last 3 years

3-year detail · Item 20

Opened (3yr)
15
Closed (3yr)
5
Terminated (3yr)
0
Non-renewed (3yr)
0
Transfers (3yr)
4
Reacquired (3yr)
1
Franchisor bought back
Termination rate
10.0%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
2022
145
Franchised units
2023
159+14
Franchised units
2024
168+9
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 4 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 3.6% charge-off
Total loans
120
Loan volume
$50.0M
Median loan
$292K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
3.6%
rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
96.4%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
50
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
5.6%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
N/A
NAICS 4452
Jobs supported
227
5.2 per loan
Lender concentration
31%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 0% went to startups / new businesses, 100% to established operators

Vintage analysis

Kilwins charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Kilwins charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 3 vintages from 2014 to 2016. Rates range from 0.0% to 0.0%.0%5%10%'14'15'16

Top lenders financing Kilwins franchisees

The Huntington National Bank5 loans
Ameris Bank2 loans
Capital One, National Association2 loans

Showing 3 of 50 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 3.6% — 78% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off3.6%
Verdict score75/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Going concernClear

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier75Verdict score 75/100

Kilwins presents moderate-to-caution risk due to lack of earnings transparency, slow growth trajectory, historical litigation over franchisee conduct, and wide investment variance without disclosed profitability data.

High confidence±3 pts
3743

Litigation (Item 3)

Kilwins v. Berakovich et al. (Case No. 11-3196-CZ, Emmet County, Michigan) – franchisee competition covenant violation; settled April 2013 for $180,000 plus other terms.

Largest disclosed settlement: $180,000

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Beene Garter, A Doeren Mayhew Firm

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $19.8MYr 2: $16.4M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Consolidated statement of operations for Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc. and Subsidiaries; year ended December 31, 2024; royalties were $7,131,164 of $19,827,055 total operating revenues.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 75 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDSlow unit growth of 5.7% YoY with 172 units suggests mature/saturating market with limited expansion momentum
  2. 02HIGH2011 litigation over non-compete violations and fraud indicates franchisee disputes and enforcement challenges
  3. 03MINORHigh investment range ($295k–$880k) with wide variance suggests unpredictable startup costs and location-dependent performance
  4. 04MEDSeasonal business model (confectionery/chocolates) creates cash flow volatility not addressed in disclosed metrics

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 157 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 5.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNot exclusive
Initial training200 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewals1
Territory typeprotected
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryNo
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)2 years
Non-compete (miles)10 mi
Right of first refusalYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationPetoskey, Michigan
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMI
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Kilwins v. Berakovich et al. (Case No. 11-3196-CZ, Emmet County, Michigan) – franchisee competition covenant violation; settled April 2013 for $180,000 plus other terms.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
43 hrs
On-the-job training
157 hrs
Training location
Petoskey, Michigan (headquarters) plus franchisee's store
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
6 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Kilwins POS System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

Site selection assistance
Grand opening support
Lease negotiation help

Technology: Kilwins POS System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

5 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 5 contacts · $49
Free preview
(231) 347-••••MI
Unlock all 5 contacts
(339) 224-••••MA
(484) 885-••••PA
(609) 703-••••NJ
(231) 675-••••MI

FDD download

Kilwins · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Kilwins franchise?

The total investment to open a Kilwins franchise ranges from $513K – $880K, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Kilwins franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Kilwins FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $933K. The median is $802K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

What is Item 19 in the Kilwins FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Kilwins FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Kilwins's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Kilwins has a charge-off rate of 3.6% across 120 loans, meaning 3.6% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Kilwins franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Kilwins has 172 total units in the United States, including 168 franchised units and 4 company-owned units. 15 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Kilwins a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Kilwins as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 75 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Kilwins, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.