Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream logo

Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsOHFranchising since 1989
AStrongest tierStrongest tier90/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$405K – $995K
Disclosed sales
$1.1M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (5)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01147FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Handel's Homemade Ice Cream is a franchise serving fresh, made-in-store premium ice cream in dozens of flavors. Franchisees run shops managing on-site ice-cream production, scooping, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream franchise requires a total initial investment of $405K – $995K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.1M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$405K – $995K
65th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.1M
21st pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
173
82nd pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$405K – $995K
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$20K – $50K
Median $33K
near median
Avg Revenue
$1.1M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 5 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
173 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $405K – $995K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.1M/year (median $1.0M).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 90/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +20 franchised outlets in the latest year (20 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 66.7% CAGR over 3 years with 173 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Handel's Enterprises, LLC
Parent company
Handel's Holdco, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Handel's Holdco, LLC (majority owned by ClearLight Partners III, LLC)
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2026 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Jennifer A. Schuler
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
3830 Starr Centre Drive, Canfield, Ohio 44406
Auditor
Schroedel, Scullin & Bestic, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$18.3M
vs $15.4M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
Jennifer A. Schuler
Headquarters
OH
FDD year
2026
States available
15

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 44% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$405K – $995KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$20K – $50K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$20K$50K
Equipment, build-out, other$335K$895K
Total initial investment$405K$995K

Source: Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$405K – $995K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$20K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$600
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$15K
Inventory (initial)$16K – $35K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 14% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 49 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 49 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size144 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$735K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,115,650 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $405K–$995K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $20K–$50K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$735K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.0M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
144 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$170K→$2.6MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$666K→$1.6M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank21th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank65th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank82th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank1th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 166 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.1M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.6x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 66.7% CAGR over 3 years across 173 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream Compares

Metric
Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream
Category median
vs median
Investment
$700K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.1M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
173
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units173Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 53 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth+66.7% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
173
Opened
20
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
8
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
95%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+66.7%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+66.7%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
2
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
17
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Ceased ops
50.0%
Units that stopped operating
2023
117
Franchised units
2024
145+28
Franchised units
2025
165+20
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 21 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 21 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • North Dakota
  • Rhode Island
  • South Dakota
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

167 current owners across 21 states.

  • CA 56
  • OH 22
  • TX 16
  • UT 14
  • AZ 10
  • PA 7
  • IN 6
  • NC 6
  • FL 4
  • NV 4
  • OR 4
  • SC 4
  • +9 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 11 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 5 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
5
Loan volume
$533K
Median loan
$50K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (5)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 5 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (5)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (5)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
2
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (5)
Verdict score90/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier90Verdict score 90/100

Handel's presents moderate-to-caution risk: litigation threatens brand integrity, missing profitability data obscures true returns, and regulatory missteps suggest inconsistent franchise operations oversight.

High confidence±6 pts
8496

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

1) Hendrix v. Handel's Enterprises (2025, EDCA): class action re homemade ice cream marketing claims, pending. 2) Commissioner of Business Oversight v. Handel's Enterprises and Leonard Fisher (2018, CA DBO): administrative penalty $5,000 + $13,200 fees re FDD disclosure violation, resolved February 2019.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Schroedel, Scullin & Bestic, LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $18.3MYr 2: $15.4MNon-royalty: $0.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2024 audited (year ended Dec 31, 2024) for Handel's Enterprises, LLC. Revenue recognized at a point in time $8,793,188 (product/equipment sales) and over time $9,511,392 (franchise/royalty). Interest income of $338,495 reported as other income. 48% of total revenue ($8,773,841) derived from required franchisee purchases/leases per Item 8.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 90 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHActive consumer class action litigation alleging false advertising regarding 'homemade' claims—core to brand identity and marketing
  2. 02MEDRegulatory action by California Commissioner regarding FDD delivery timing raises compliance concerns at corporate level
  3. 03MEDHigh initial investment range ($460k–$996k) with 6% royalty and no disclosed average net profit creates uncertainty on ROI timeline
  4. 04MINORRapid unit growth (23.9% YoY) may indicate quality control challenges or oversaturation in existing markets

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 166 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training90 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ30 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice14 days
Termination groundsℹ2
Curable defaultsℹ3
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationCanfield, Ohio
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawOH
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

1) Hendrix v. Handel's Enterprises (2025, EDCA): class action re homemade ice cream marketing claims, pending. 2) Commissioner of Business Oversight v. Handel's Enterprises and Leonard Fisher (2018, CA DBO): administrative penalty $5,000 + $13,200 fees re FDD disclosure violation, resolved February 2019.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
4 hrs
On-the-job training
86 hrs
Training location
Canfield, OH or other training facility designated by franchisor
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Franchisor-designated POS with KDS integration
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Franchisor-designated POS with KDS integration

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

178 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 178 contacts · $49
Free preview
972-208-••••TX
Unlock all 178 contacts
682-587-••••TX
330-467-••••OH
760-295-••••CA
(248) 408-••••CO

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream franchise?

The total investment to open a Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream franchise ranges from $405K – $995K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.1M. The median is $1.0M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream?

Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream is franchised by Handel's Enterprises, LLC. Its parent company is Handel's Holdco, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Handel's Holdco, LLC (majority owned by ClearLight Partners III, LLC). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream has 173 total units in the United States, including 165 franchised units and 8 company-owned units. 20 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 90 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.