Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Elements Massage logo

Elements Massage Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Personal Care & BeautyCOFranchising since 2006
AStrongest tierStrongest tier78/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$567K – $1.1M
Disclosed sales
$981K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
0.0%
on 59 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00847FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Elements Massage is a wellness franchise providing therapeutic massage on a membership model. Franchisees run studios scheduling licensed massage therapists and managing recurring memberships and front-desk operations.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Elements Massage franchise requires a total initial investment of $567K – $1.1M, including a $40K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $981K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 59 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$567K – $1.1M
51st pct Personal Care…
Avg gross sales
$981K
26th pct Personal Care…
Royalty
6.0%
12th pct Personal Care…
Units
239
52nd pct Personal Care…
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$567K – $1.1M
Median $402K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$40K – $40K
Median $45K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$80K – $140K
Median $34K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$981K
Median $527K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 7.9%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
59 loans · Median 5.7%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
239 units
Median 40 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
2.5%
Median 0.8%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $567K – $1.1M including a $40K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $981K/year (median $897K).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 78/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 59 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (6 opened, 6 closed); 2 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Elements Therapeutic Massage, LLC
Parent company
WellBiz Brands, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Transom Bloom Topco, LP (Transom Entities)
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and Manager
Amanda Clark
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
1890 Wynkoop Street, Unit 1, Denver, Colorado 80202
Auditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$23.8M
vs $25.4M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

2 other brands on this site name Transom Bloom Topco, LP (Transom Entities) as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Amanda Clark
Headquarters
CO
Founded
2006
FDD year
2026
States available
33

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 107% above the typical personal care & beauty franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$567K – $1.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 27 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$40,000Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$80K – $140K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Elements Massage: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$40K$40K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$80K$140K
Equipment, build-out, other$447K$918K
Total initial investment$567K$1.1M

Source: Elements Massage 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$567K – $1.1M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$80K – $140K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$40K – $40K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Elements Massage: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$600
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$20K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$28K – $35K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 86% above the personal care & beauty norm.

Avg gross sales$981KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 66 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$897KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 66 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross revenue
Sample size234 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Elements Massage until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$943K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Elements Massage unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $981,430 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $567K–$1.1M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $80K–$140K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$943K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$981K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$897K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross revenue
Sample size
234 outlets
vs category median 38 · large
Range (low → high)
$155K→$2.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 66 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank26th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank51th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank52th
vs Personal Care & Beauty peers
Risk score rank9th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands

Showing the headline figures — all 163 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $981K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.2x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Personal Care & Beauty median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -2.0% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Personal Care & Beauty medians

How Elements Massage Compares

Metric
Elements Massage
Category median
vs median
Investment
$833K
$402Kmiddle half $261K–$677K · n=112
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$981K
$527Kmiddle half $402K–$892K · n=59
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
239
40middle half 8–151 · n=111
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units239Verified — printed on page 68 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-2.0% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate2.5% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
239
Opened
6
Last reporting year
Closed
6
Terminated
6
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
2.5%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-2.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-2.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
6
Not renewed
0
Transferred
15
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
2
0.01 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
2
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
244
Franchised units
2024
239-5
Franchised units
2025
239±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 18 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 18 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

31 current owners across 18 states.

  • IL 4
  • CA 3
  • CO 3
  • MN 3
  • TX 3
  • AZ 2
  • MA 2
  • CT 1
  • FL 1
  • IN 1
  • KY 1
  • NC 1
  • +6 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
59
Loan volume
$17.3M
Median loan
$290K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
on 59 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
25
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
7.9%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.4%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
1,416
8.2 per loan
Lender concentration
17%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 59% went to startups / new businesses, 41% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in other personal care services, franchised businesses charge off at 17.4% vs 20.9% for independents — franchising is associated with 17% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Elements Massage charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Elements Massage charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 3 vintages from 2018 to 2021. Rates range from 0.0% to 0.0%.0%5%10%'18'19'21

Top lenders financing Elements Massage franchisees

The Huntington National Bank10 loans—
Numerica CU5 loans0.0%
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company4 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 25 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Elements Massage from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
74%
Avg interest rate
7.86%
Lender concentration
16.9%
Job velocity
8.2 per $100K
Startup risk premium
0.0pp
NAICS benchmark
5.1%
NAICS 812199
Jobs supported
1,416

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 17% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank10$3.1MN/A
2Numerica CU5$1.2M0.0%
3Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company4$830K0.0%
4Stearns Bank National Association4$785K0.0%
5Celtic Bank Corporation4$1.1M0.0%
6Wells Fargo Bank National Association4$1.6M0.0%
7Citizens Bank3$1.4MN/A
8Idaho First Bank3$550K0.0%
9Northeast Bank3$75KN/A
10Salem Five Cents Savings Bank2$150K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas900.0%
AZArizona600.0%
COColorado500.0%
FLFlorida400.0%
MAMassachusetts400.0%
PAPennsylvania400.0%
WAWashington400.0%
CACalifornia30--
IDIdaho300.0%
NCNorth Carolina30--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2013
1
2014
1
2015
1
2018
10
2019
7
2020
4
2021
6
2022
9
2023
7
2024
6
2025
7

Borrower profile

Startup28 (50%)
Existing (2+ yr)16 (29%)
Ownership change5 (9%)
New (< 2 yr)5 (9%)
Unanswered2 (4%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 59 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0% · 59 loans
Verdict score78/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier78Verdict score 78/100

Elements Massage presents elevated risk due to shrinking unit base, undisclosed profitability, pending litigation over IP/noncompetes, and a prior settlement indicating unresolved franchisor-franchisee tensions.

Why this reads harsher than the A grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

High confidence±4 pts
7482

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

One completed arbitration: Goldman/But There's the Rub v. ETM (AAA 2019), claims of pre-sale misrepresentation; settled 2020 with refund of $45,000 initial franchise fee, no admission of wrongdoing.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Grant Thornton LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $23.8MYr 2: $25.4MNon-royalty: $1.7M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2025 total revenues comprise royalties $13,840,046, franchise fees $606,754, marketing revenues $7,388,931, technology and other revenues $1,741,288, and company-owned studio revenues $228,927. Consolidated statements for Elements Therapeutic Massage, LLC and Subsidiaries.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 78 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-0.4% YoY) suggests system contraction and potential franchisee dissatisfaction
  2. 02MINORTwo pending arbitrations involving IP, noncompetes, and supply disputes indicate franchisor-franchisee relationship deterioration
  3. 03MINORPrior completed arbitration with franchise fee refund suggests previous franchisee grievances were substantial enough to warrant settlement
  4. 04MINORHigh initial investment ($470K minimum) paired with 6% royalty on $894K avg revenue ($53.6K annually) leaves thin margins for labor-intensive massage business
  5. 05HIGHLitigation involving Amazing Lash (sister brand under same franchisor) raises questions about corporate governance and franchise system management quality

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 163 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training38 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ3 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice60 days
Termination groundsℹ23
Curable defaultsℹ6
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationDenver, Colorado (within 50 miles of principal place of business)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawCO
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

One completed arbitration: Goldman/But There's the Rub v. ETM (AAA 2019), claims of pre-sale misrepresentation; settled 2020 with refund of $45,000 initial franchise fee, no admission of wrongdoing.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
38 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
Virtual / Home Study / Colorado Support Center or another designated location
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
Franchisee selects site within approved Search Territory; franchisor must approve
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

31 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 31 contacts · $49
Free preview
(480) 252-••••AZ
Unlock all 31 contacts
(612) 991-••••MN
(502) 291-••••KY
(469) 855-••••TX
(860) 462-••••CT

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Elements Massage franchise?

The total investment to open a Elements Massage franchise ranges from $567K – $1.1M, with an initial franchise fee of $40K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Elements Massage franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Elements Massage FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $981K. The median is $897K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Elements Massage?

Elements Massage is franchised by Elements Therapeutic Massage, LLC. Its parent company is WellBiz Brands, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Transom Bloom Topco, LP (Transom Entities). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Elements Massage FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Elements Massage FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Elements Massage's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Elements Massage has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 59 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Elements Massage franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Elements Massage has 239 total units in the United States, including 239 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 6 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Elements Massage a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Elements Massage as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 78 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Elements Massage, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.