Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Bodenvy logo

Bodenvy Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Personal Care & BeautyFLFranchising since 2023
DBelow averageBelow average34/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$609K – $1.0M
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (2)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00354Data QualityExcellent81%FDD 2023 · 3yr old
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2023 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Bodenvy is a body-contouring franchise offering CoolSculpting, skin tightening, and non-invasive fat loss and weight-loss services. Franchisees run the studios, managing technicians, appointments, and treatments.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Bodenvy franchise requires a total initial investment of $609K – $1.0M, including a $65K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. The 2023 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 5 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$609K – $1.0M
53rd pct Personal Care…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Company-owned onlyn=2
Royalty
7.0%
45th pct Personal Care…
Units
2
5th pct Personal Care…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$609K – $1.0M
Median $402K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$65K – $65K
Median $45K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $100K
Median $34K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
7.0%
Median 6.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.9%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (2)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 2 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
2 units
Median 40 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.8%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $609K – $1.0M including a $65K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports affiliate owned income statement rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 34/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • DATAItem 19 reports affiliate owned income statement rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable. Ask franchisees directly for full unit-level revenue.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Bod Brands Franchising, Inc.
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
James "Jim" Kucik
Incorporated in
FL
HQ
415 North Orlando Ave., Suite 104, Winter Park, FL 32789
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$60K
Most recent fiscal year

Overview

About

CEO
James "Jim" Kucik
Headquarters
FL
Founded
2021
FDD year
2023
States available
1

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 101% above the typical personal care & beauty franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$609K – $1.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2023 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$65,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2023 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty7.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2023 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$50K – $100K

Source: FDD 2023 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2023 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Bodenvy: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$65K$65K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$50K$100K
Equipment, build-out, other$494K$843K
Total initial investment$609K$1.0M

Source: Bodenvy 2023 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$609K – $1.0M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $100K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$65K – $65K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
7.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
$500/month plus $200 per CoolSculpting machine in excess …
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Bodenvy: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$500
Training fee$450
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$3K
Inventory (initial)$20K – $35K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeaffiliate owned income sta…
Sample size2

Source: FDD 2023 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Bodenvy is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Bodenvy unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $609K–$1.0M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$884K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2023 FDD

Financial Performance

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Based on a sample of only 2

Item 19 type
affiliate owned income statement
Sample size
2
vs category median 38 · small
Range (low → high)
$1.7M→$4.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 51 of the 2023 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2022
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2023
Disclosed in the 2023 filing, covering 2022
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank53th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank45th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank5th
vs Personal Care & Beauty peers
Risk score rank91th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands

Showing the headline figures — all 144 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Personal Care & Beauty median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports affiliate owned income statement rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Personal Care & Beauty medians

How Bodenvy Compares

Metric
Bodenvy
Category median
vs median
Investment
$809K
$402Kmiddle half $261K–$677K · n=112
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
N/A
$527Kmiddle half $402K–$892K · n=59
N/A
Unit Count
2
40middle half 8–151 · n=111
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units2Verified — printed on page 53 of the 2023 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2023 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
2
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
3
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2020
0
Franchised units
2021
0±0
Franchised units
2022
0±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 4 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

4 current owners across 4 states.

  • FL 1
  • GA 1
  • MI 1
  • NJ 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 2 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$825K
Median loan
$413K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (2)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 2 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (2)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (2)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
1
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (2)
Verdict score34/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average34Verdict score 34/100
Low confidence±14 pts
2048

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Financial statements are UNAUDITED. Balance sheet as of September 30, 2023; profit and loss for period January 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023. Prepared without an audit; no independent CPA has audited these figures. New franchisor: total revenue in prior fiscal year was $0. Net worth shown is Total Equity (Owner's Equity plus Retained Earnings plus Net Income).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 34 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDOnly 3 units in the system suggests extremely limited scale, making it difficult to verify unit economics, share best practices, or sustain corporate overhead
  2. 02MINORUnknown growth trajectory with only 3 units raises questions about franchisee recruitment, retention, and the franchisor's ability to grow the brand
  3. 03MEDNo disclosed litigation is unusual for a franchise and may indicate either a very new system or incomplete FDD transparency
  4. 04MED7% royalty on $2.95M average revenue ($206k annually per unit) leaves limited margin for franchisee profitability relative to $373k reported net income

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 144 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training58 hrs

Source: FDD 2023 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ4
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius25 mi
Territory population150,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ30 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationWinter Park, Florida
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawFL
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
24 hrs
On-the-job training
34 hrs
Training location
Orlando, FL; Winter Park, FL; or franchisee location
Ongoing training
Optional
Site selection
franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
MindBody/Messenger AI
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: MindBody/Messenger AI

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

4 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 4 contacts · $49
Free preview
(908) 397-••••NJ
Unlock all 4 contacts
(734) 678-••••MI
(407) 867-••••FL
(806) 281-••••GA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Bodenvy franchise?

The total investment to open a Bodenvy franchise ranges from $609K – $1.0M, with an initial franchise fee of $65K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Bodenvy franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Bodenvy FDD discloses outlet figures from $1.7M to $4.7M but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Bodenvy?

Bodenvy is franchised by Bod Brands Franchising, Inc.. The FDD names no parent company. Source: FDD Item 1, 2023 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Bodenvy FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Bodenvy FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Bodenvy's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Bodenvy (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Bodenvy franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Bodenvy has 2 total units in the United States.

Is Bodenvy a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Bodenvy as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 34 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Bodenvy, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.