Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Comfort Keepers logo

Comfort Keepers Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CareCAFranchising since 1999
AStrongest tierStrongest tier100/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$120K – $191K
Disclosed sales
$1.3M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
3.9%
on 116 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00604FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Comfort Keepers is a non-medical in-home care franchise providing companionship, personal care, and light housekeeping to seniors and disabled clients. Franchisees run an agency recruiting and scheduling caregivers and managing client care and compliance.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Comfort Keepers franchise requires a total initial investment of $120K – $191K, including a $55K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.3M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 3.9% charge-off rate across 116 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$120K – $191K
65th pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
$1.3M
Net sales26th pct Senior Care
Royalty
5.0%
5th pct Senior Care
Units
624
96th pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
3.9%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$120K – $191K
Median $137K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$55K – $55K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$39K – $191K
Median $38K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.3M
Median $1.1M
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
3.9%
116 loans · Median 3.9%
near median
System Size
624 units
Median 25 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
5.3%
Median 2.1%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
6 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $120K – $191K including a $55K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.3M/year (median $857K).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 100/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 3.9% across 116 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +41 franchised outlets in the latest year (45 opened, 4 closed); 3 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 17.0% CAGR over 3 years with 624 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
CK Franchising, Inc.
Parent company
CK Holdco, Inc.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
Elevate Care International Inc. (ECI)
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Natalie Black
Incorporated in
OH
HQ
1 Park Plaza, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92614
Auditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$49.3M
vs $42.3M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Natalie Black
Headquarters
CA
Founded
1999
FDD year
2025
States available
44

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 14% above the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$120K – $191KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 28 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$55,000Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Royalty5.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 19 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$39K – $191K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Comfort Keepers: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$55K$55K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$39K$191K
Equipment, build-out, other$26K$0
Total initial investment$120K$191K

Source: Comfort Keepers 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$120K – $191K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$39K – $191K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$55K – $55K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
5.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Comfort Keepers: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$0
Transfer fee$8K
Renewal fee$5K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 20% above the senior care norm.

Avg gross sales$1.3M

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$857KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet sales
Sample size600 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Comfort Keepers until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$270K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Comfort Keepers unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,277,857 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $120K–$191K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $39K–$191K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$270K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$1.3M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$857K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net sales
Sample size
600 outlets
vs category median 22 · large
Range (low → high)
$9K→$21.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
The FDD edition these figures were read from
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank26th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank65th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank5th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank96th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank4th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 8.2x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.3M/year in gross sales. Median is $857K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 8.2x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Senior Care median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 17.0% CAGR over 3 years across 624 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Comfort Keepers Compares

Metric
Comfort Keepers
Category median
vs median
Investment
$155K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.3M
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
624
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units624Verified — printed on page 82 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+17.0% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate5.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
624
Opened
45
Last reporting year
Closed
4
Terminated
3
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
5.3%
Company-owned
5
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+17.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+17.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
3
Not renewed
1
Transferred
31
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
3
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
9
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
529
Franchised units
2023
578+49
Franchised units
2024
619+41
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 45 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 45 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

354 current owners across 45 states; 1 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • CA 39
  • FL 26
  • PA 26
  • TX 23
  • MI 18
  • IN 16
  • OH 16
  • IL 14
  • NC 13
  • NJ 13
  • SC 11
  • GA 10
  • +33 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 3.9% charge-off
Total loans
116
Loan volume
$66.1M
Median loan
$200K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
3.9%
on 116 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
96.1%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
58
Defaults
3
Typical loan rate
6.6%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
7.5%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
6,896
10.4 per loan
Lender concentration
15%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 26% went to startups / new businesses, 74% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in home health care services, franchised businesses charge off at 7.5% vs 11.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 35% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Comfort Keepers charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Comfort Keepers charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 13 vintages from 2003 to 2020. Rates range from 0.0% to 25.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%'03'07'13'16'20

Top lenders financing Comfort Keepers franchisees

Live Oak Banking Company17 loans0.0%
The Huntington National Bank8 loans0.0%
PNC Bank, National Association5 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 58 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
7
Loan volume
$1.9M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
157

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Comfort Keepers from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.4%
Avg SBA guarantee
69%
Avg interest rate
6.62%
Avg chargeoff amount
$91K
Lender concentration
14.7%
Job velocity
10.4 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+20.0pp
NAICS benchmark
5.7%
NAICS 621610
Jobs supported
6,896

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 15% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Live Oak Banking Company17$18.4M0.0%
2The Huntington National Bank8$2.3M0.0%
3PNC Bank, National Association5$2.5M0.0%
4U.S. Bank, National Association5$3.1M0.0%
5Bank of America, National Association4$128K25.0%
6Bank Five Nine4$2.1M0.0%
7CIBC Bank USA4$3.1M0.0%
8Community First Bank of Indiana3$138K0.0%
9Wells Fargo Bank National Association3$876K0.0%
10UMB Bank, National Association3$642K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
WIWisconsin1000.0%
CACalifornia900.0%
FLFlorida7120.0%
OHOhio700.0%
WAWashington700.0%
VAVirginia600.0%
TXTexas500.0%
ILIllinois400.0%
MDMaryland400.0%
MIMichigan400.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2003
3
2004
7
2005
7
2006
2
2007
4
2009
1
2010
4
2011
1
2012
3
2013
7
2014
4
2015
6
2016
3
2017
7
2018
2
2019
9
2020
8
2021
6
2022
14
2023
8
2024
3
2025
5
2026
2

Borrower profile

Ownership change25 (44%)
Existing (2+ yr)14 (25%)
Startup9 (16%)
New (< 2 yr)6 (11%)
Unanswered2 (4%)
Established (5+ yr)1 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 3.9% — 76% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off3.9% · 116 loans
Verdict score100/100 (higher is better)
Litigation6 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier100Verdict score 100/100

Comfort Keepers presents elevated legal and operational risk due to active wage-and-hour litigation, vicarious liability claims, and regulatory investigations into hiring practices, combined with unverified profitability claims and modest unit growth in a mature system.

High confidence±4 pts
96100

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

6 cases: (1) Broach v. CKFI wage/hour class arbitration, settled 2018, CKFI paid $10K; (2) WA AG civil investigation re non-solicit provisions, settled 2018 via Assurance of Discontinuance; (3) CKFI v. 4 Seniors Home Care (Quebec master franchisee), settled 2019; (4) CA AG civil investigation re client services agreement provisions, settled 2024 with $500K fine; (5) Rupp v. CKFI et al. (negligence/client injury), pending trial April 2026; (6) Cooper v. CKFI et al. (negligence/client injury), filed July 2025, pending.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Grant Thornton LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $49.3MYr 2: $42.3MNon-royalty: $0.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Combined revenues per audited Combined Statements of Operations for CK Franchising, Inc. and SDX Home Care Operations, LLC dba Comfort Keepers, fiscal years ended August 31, 2025 and 2024. Other income of $194,664 (FY2025) shown separately under other income (expenses).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 100 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHActive litigation including wage-and-hour class action and state AG investigations into non-solicit/hire practices creates operational and compliance risk
  2. 02MINORVicarious liability negligence claims (2x) indicate potential gaps in training, screening, or supervision of caregivers—critical in home health services
  3. 03MINORModest unit growth (7.1% YoY) suggests market saturation or competitive pressure in a 624-unit system
  4. 04MINORMaster franchise termination in Quebec signals relationship breakdown and possible expansion strategy failure
  5. 05MINORSignificant investment range ($119,560–$190,700) with vague profit attribution—wide variance suggests inconsistent unit economics

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training48 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population200,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationIrvine, California
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawOH
Litigation count6
View Item 3 litigation summary

6 cases: (1) Broach v. CKFI wage/hour class arbitration, settled 2018, CKFI paid $10K; (2) WA AG civil investigation re non-solicit provisions, settled 2018 via Assurance of Discontinuance; (3) CKFI v. 4 Seniors Home Care (Quebec master franchisee), settled 2019; (4) CA AG civil investigation re client services agreement provisions, settled 2024 with $500K fine; (5) Rupp v. CKFI et al. (negligence/client injury), pending trial April 2026; (6) Cooper v. CKFI et al. (negligence/client injury), filed July 2025, pending.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
45 hrs
On-the-job training
3 hrs
Training location
eLearning, webinars, and in-person at Irvine, CA corporate offices
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
Franchisee selects; must be within territory and in commercial/retail space
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Viv Technologies
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Viv Technologies

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

355 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 355 contacts · $49
Free preview
(614) 263-••••OH
Unlock all 355 contacts
(303) 993-••••CO
(909) 244-••••CA
(901) 752-••••TN
(513) 860-••••OH

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Comfort Keepers franchise?

The total investment to open a Comfort Keepers franchise ranges from $120K – $191K, with an initial franchise fee of $55K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Comfort Keepers franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Comfort Keepers FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.3M. The median is $857K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Comfort Keepers?

Comfort Keepers is franchised by CK Franchising, Inc.. Its parent company is CK Holdco, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Elevate Care International Inc. (ECI). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Comfort Keepers FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Comfort Keepers FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Comfort Keepers's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Comfort Keepers has a charge-off rate of 3.9% across 116 loans, meaning 3.9% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Comfort Keepers franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Comfort Keepers has 624 total units in the United States, including 619 franchised units and 5 company-owned units. 45 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Comfort Keepers a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Comfort Keepers as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 100 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Comfort Keepers, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.