Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing

The Camp Transformation Center litigation history

What The Camp Transformation Center disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
5
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2025
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

Pending: Ventura County DA civil action alleging unfair competition/false advertising and health-studio-services violations (denied by franchisor). Concluded: CA Dept. of Industrial Relations wage-and-hour citations against affiliate TCB and founders, settled for $1,000,000 (2024); Prive class action wage-and-hour suit against TCB settled for up to $1.5 million (2020); Corriea consumer refund class action settled for $10,000 (2019); Washington DFI consent order (2018) re: unregistered franchise offer, $500 paid.

Item 3 (litigation) · 5 matters disclosed · 1 pending listed

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Pending (1)

  • People of the State of California v. The Camp Bootcamp, Inc. d/b/a The Camp Transformation Center, The Camp Franchise Systems, LLC, Alejandra Font, and Does 1-59

    pending

    Government or regulatory action · filed 2023-09-19 · Superior Ct. Calif., County of Ventura · 2023CUMCO 14173

    “… Case No. 2023CUMCO 14173 (Superior Ct. Calif., County of Ventura), filed September 19, 2023.”Page 9 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

Parent, affiliates, master franchisor and subfranchisor

Concluded (4)

  • Corriea, et al. v. The Camp Bootcamp, Inc. dba The Camp Transformation Center and Does 1 through 100

    settled

    Brought by a third party · The Camp Bootcamp, Inc. (TCB, our affiliate) · filed 2019-05-10 · Super. Ct. Calif., San Bernardino County · CIV-DS-1914377

    “… Case No. CIV-DS-1914377 (Super.”Page 9 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “the parties entered into a settlement under which TCB agreed to pay $10,000 and the plaintiffs released all claims against TCB and its affiliates.” (page 10)

  • Matter with no printed caption

    settled

    Government or regulatory action · The Camp Bootcamp, Inc. (TCB, our affiliate), Dr. Saman Bakhtiar and Alejandra Font · filed 2018-01-24 · California Department of Industrial Relations · 35-CM-208860-17

    “California Department of Industrial Relations, Case No. 35-CM-208860-17. On January 24, 2018, the California Department of Industrial Relations issued citations to our affiliate, TCB, and our founders, Dr. Saman Bakhtiar and Alejandra Font, alleging”Page 9 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “agreed to pay a total sum of $1,000,000 in installment payments and the plaintiffs released all claims against TCB and its affiliates.”

  • Matter with no printed caption

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · Fitness Concepts, Inc. (FCI) and The Camp Bootcamp, Inc. (TCB), our affiliates, and Saman Bakhtiar · filed 2018-09-06 · Washington Department of Financial Institutions · S-18-2491-18-CO01

    “our affiliates, Fitness Concepts, Inc. (“FCI”) and TCB, and our late co-founder, Saman Bakhtiar, entered into a Consent Order with the Washington Department of Financial Institutions (DFI), Consent Order No. S-18-2491-18-CO01, regarding a licensed location in Vancouver, Washington.”Page 10 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • Prive, et al. v. The Camp Bootcamp, Inc.

    settled

    Brought by a third party · The Camp Bootcamp, Inc. (TCB, our affiliate) · filed 2017-06-28 · Superior Ct. Calif., San Bernardino County · CIVDS1712280

    “… Case No. CIVDS1712280 (Superior Ct. Calif., San Bernardino County), filed June 28, 2017.”Page 9 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “agreed to pay a maximum amount of $1.5 million into a settlement fund to be used for settlement administration costs, legal fees to class counsel, the employer’s share of payroll taxes, and a small award to the class representatives, with the remaining amount to be distributed to class members.”

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Pending DA false-advertising action + $1M wage-and-hour settlement + class action (4 matters)

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?