Snelling Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Snelling, a HireQuest brand, is a staffing franchise placing temporary and direct-hire workers in office, industrial, and professional roles. Franchisees run a staffing office recruiting candidates, managing placements, and serving employer accounts.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Snelling franchise requires a total initial investment of $45K – $151K, including a $3K – $25K franchise fee and an ongoing 4.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.4M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 10.5% charge-off rate across 22 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Data last verified · figures per the 2025 FDD issuance
Overview
- Investment
- $45K – $151K
- 10th pct Business Serv…
- Avg gross sales
- $1.4M
- 21st pct Business Serv…
- Royalty
- 4.5%
- 4th pct Business Serv…
- Units
- 76
- 39th pct Business Serv…
- SBA charge-off
- 10.5%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Business Services · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Business Services avg · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- Total investment $45K – $151K including a $3K franchise fee, 4.5% ongoing royalty.
- Average unit revenue of $1.4M/year (median $1.0M).
- Verdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 65/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 10.5% across 22 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- HQ Franchising Corporation
- Parent company
- HireQuest, Inc.
- Predecessor
- Hire Quest, L.L.C.
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- President and CEO of HireQuest, Inc.
- Richard F. Hermanns
- CEO experience
- 23 yrs
- Years in role or industry
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- HQ
- 111 Springhall Drive, Goose Creek, SC 29445
- Auditor
- Forvis Mazars LLP
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $37.9M
- vs $34.6M prior year
- Management churn noted
- Frequent turnover
- Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes
Overview
About
- CEO
- Richard F. Hermanns
- Headquarters
- SC
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 25
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 63% below the typical business services franchise.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
Full Item 7 breakdown12 line items
Initial investment breakdown
| Line item | Low | High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Franchise Fee | $3K | $25K | |
| Real Propertynot refundable | $800 | $2K | |
| Leasehold Improvements, Furniture, Fixturesnot refundable | $2K | $15K | |
| Equipmentnot refundable | $3K | $5K | |
| Opening Advertisingnot refundable | $3K | $5K | |
| Training Expensesnot refundable | $2K | $3K | |
| Start-up Suppliesnot refundable | $200 | $1K | |
| Insurancenot refundable | $1K | $5K | |
| Utility Deposits | $200 | $3K | |
| Professional Feesnot refundable | $300 | $4K | |
| Additional Funds (12 months)not refundable | $30K | $75K | |
| Softwarenot refundable | $1K | $5K | |
| Total initial investment | $45K | $148K |
Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $45K – $151K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $30K – $75K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $3K – $25K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- 4.5%
- percentage_of_gross · typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 1.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 5.5%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 4.5% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 1.0% of gross sales |
| Technology fee | $1K |
| Transfer fee | $5K |
| Total fee load | 5.5% of rev |
A 5.5% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales land near the business services norm.
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · estimated
Returns at a glance
Indicative numbers using FDD Item 7 / Item 19 inputs and category-benchmarked cost ratios. Full single-unit, 25-unit portfolio, and LBO models (with every input editable to stress-test your own scenario) live on the financials page.
Store EBITDA · annual
$237K
17.5% margin
Unlevered ROIC
158%
EBITDA / total invested capital
Payback
8 mo
cash-on-cash, unlevered
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $1.4M
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $1.0M
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- Average and Median Profit
- Sample size
- 74 units
- vs category median 38
- Range (low → high)
- $2K→$6.4M
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Transparency
- 3 / 10
- vs category median 3 / 10 · typical
Compared against 356 Business Services brands
Revenue is 13.8x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $1.4M/year in gross sales. Median is $1.0M — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 13.8x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 5.5% — below the Business Services average of 11.9%.
Disclosure
Transparency score 3/10 — moderate disclosure depth. Average and range data are available but detailed cohort breakdowns may be limited.
Operator retention
System expanding at 11.8% CAGR over 3 years across 76 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Business Services averages
How Snelling Compares
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 76
- Opened
- 3
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 5
- Terminated
- 0
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 0
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 0.0%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -2.6%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- +11.8%
- Compounded over last 3 years
3-year detail · Item 20
- Opened (3yr)
- 3
- Terminated (3yr)
- 0
- Non-renewed (3yr)
- 0
- Transfers (3yr)
- 2
- Reacquired (3yr)
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Transfer rate
- 2.6%
- Owners selling to other franchisees
- Termination rate
- 1.3%
- Franchisor-initiated terminations
- Ceased ops
- 7.9%
- Units that stopped operating
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 23 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 22
- Loan volume
- $4.1M
- Median loan
- $186K
- average
- Charge-off rate
- 10.5%
- rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- N/A
- 5-yr charge-off
- N/A
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 13
- Defaults
- 2
- Typical loan rate
- 6.5%
- avg rate to borrowers
- vs industry
- N/A
- Jobs supported
- N/A
- Lender concentration
- 17%
- top lender's share
Vintage analysis
Snelling charge-off rate by loan vintage
Top lenders financing Snelling franchisees
Showing 3 of 13 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Premium insight
SBA Lending Report
Deep-dive into Snelling's SBA lending history: lender network, geographic footprint, interest rates, and more.
SBA Lending Report
- Principal loss rate and NAICS industry benchmark
- 10 lenders with concentration factor
- Per-state charge-off rates across 10 states
- Startup risk premium and job creation velocity
Instant access. No subscription.
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 10.5% — 34% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Strong financials: net worth $64.8M, net income $3.67M on $34.6M revenue, no bankruptcy or going-concern. One routine breach-of-contract/trade-secret suit brought BY the franchisor against a former franchisee. 76 units, +11.8% net growth, 0% turnover.
Litigation (Item 3)
Case No. 2021544173: HQ Franchising Corporation and Hire Quest, LLC v. Tardis Staffing, LLC, James Seale, Jade Holdings, Raider Staffing, Franklin Capital Holdings, and Capital Source Group. Filed April 28, 2021 in 237th District Court, Lubbock County, Texas. Claims: Breach of Contract, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Breach of Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Conversion, Tortious Interference with Contracts, and Aiding and Abetting. Former franchisee Tardis Staffing and owner James Seale allegedly converted franchise receivables and violated non-compete covenants. Settled June 4, 2021 via Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction. TRO Defendants (Tardis, Seale, Raider, Jade) agreed to pay $35,000 and comply with injunction terms. Defendants Franklin and Capital settled via confidential settlement agreements. Forbearance Agreement remains in effect.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Forvis Mazars LLP
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Score breakdown · what drove the 65 / 100 verdict
- 01HIGHOne litigation matter (franchisor as plaintiff vs former franchisee, routine commercial)
- 02MEDPositive net worth $64.8M, net income $3.67M, Item 19 disclosed, audited
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 5.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 5 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 5 years |
| Territory type | Geographic (Counties, City Limits, or Zip Codes) |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Optional |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | South Carolina |
| Litigation count | 1 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
Case No. 2021544173: HQ Franchising Corporation and Hire Quest, LLC v. Tardis Staffing, LLC, James Seale, Jade Holdings, Raider Staffing, Franklin Capital Holdings, and Capital Source Group. Filed April 28, 2021 in 237th District Court, Lubbock County, Texas. Claims: Breach of Contract, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Breach of Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Conversion, Tortious Interference with Contracts, and Aiding and Abetting. Former franchisee Tardis Staffing and owner James Seale allegedly converted franchise receivables and violated non-compete covenants. Settled June 4, 2021 via Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction. TRO Defendants (Tardis, Seale, Raider, Jade) agreed to pay $35,000 and comply with injunction terms. Defendants Franklin and Capital settled via confidential settlement agreements. Forbearance Agreement remains in effect.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 80 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 40 hrs
- Training location
- On-site and corporate
- Ongoing training
- Required
- POS system
- HQ WebConnect
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: HQ WebConnect
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
53 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
FDD download
Snelling · FDD (2025) PDF
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Snelling franchise?
The total investment to open a Snelling franchise ranges from $45K – $151K, with an initial franchise fee of $3K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Snelling franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Snelling FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.4M. The median is $1.0M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
What is Snelling's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Snelling has a charge-off rate of 10.5% across 22 loans, meaning 10.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Snelling franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Snelling has 76 total units in the United States, including 76 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 3 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Snelling a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Snelling as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 65 out of 100 (higher is better), based on our analysis of investment costs, revenue data, SBA loan performance, and growth trends. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Snelling, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Business Services franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Business Services category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.