Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Massage Heights logo

Massage Heights Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Personal Care & BeautyTexasFranchising since 2007
CAverageAverage45/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$472K – $552K
Disclosed sales
$1.0M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
22.8%
on 106 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-03422Data QualityExcellent81%FDD 2024 · 2yr old
Yes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2024 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Massage Heights franchise requires a total initial investment of $472K – $552K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2024 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.0M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 22.8% charge-off rate across 106 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✗ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$472K – $552K
46th pct Personal Care…
Avg gross sales
$1.0M
27th pct Personal Care…
Royalty
6.0%
12th pct Personal Care…
Units
104
41st pct Personal Care…
SBA charge-off
22.8%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Personal Care & Beauty · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$472K – $552K
Median $402K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $45K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$37K – $54K
Median $34K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.0M
Median $527K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.9%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
22.8%
106 loans · Median 5.7%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
104 units
Median 40 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.8%
Median 0.8%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Personal Care & Beauty median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $472K – $552K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.0M/year (median $948K).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 45/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 22.8% across 106 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (5 opened, 4 closed); 9 signed but not yet open (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Massage Heights Franchising, LLC
Parent company
SWG International, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2024 FDD
Predecessor
Massage Heights Corporate, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Shane Evans
Incorporated in
Texas
HQ
13750 US Hwy 281 North, Suite 925, San Antonio, Texas 78232
Franchisor revenue
$9.8M
Most recent fiscal year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

1 other brand on this site name SWG International, LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2024 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

Franchised retail location ("Retreat") providing membership-based therapeutic massage, skincare, and (for HWR Businesses) touchless holistic therapy services under the MASSAGE HEIGHTS BODY + FACE and HEIGHTS WELLNESS RETREAT marks.

CEO
Shane Evans
Headquarters
Texas
Founded
2007
FDD year
2024

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 27% above the typical personal care & beauty franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$472K – $552KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 26 of the 2024 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$49,500Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2024 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2024 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund3.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2024 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$37K – $54K

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2024 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Massage Heights: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$37K$54K
Equipment, build-out, other$386K$448K
Total initial investment$472K$552K

Source: Massage Heights 2024 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$472K – $552K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$37K – $54K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
3.0%
typical 3–5%

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Massage Heights: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund3.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$550
Transfer fee$12K
Renewal fee$12K

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 97% above the personal care & beauty norm.

Avg gross sales$1.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 62 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$948KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 62 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross revenue tiers
Sample size100 outlets

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Massage Heights until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$557K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Massage Heights unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,039,409 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $472K–$552K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $37K–$54K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$557K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2024 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.0M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$948K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross revenue tiers
Sample size
100 outlets
vs category median 38 · large
Range (low → high)
$306K→$2.9MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 62 of the 2024 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2023
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2024
Disclosed in the 2024 filing, covering 2023
Gross sales rank27th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank46th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank12th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank41th
vs Personal Care & Beauty peers
Risk score rank66th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 177 Personal Care & Beauty brands

Showing the headline figures — all 144 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.0M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.0x.

Fee burden

6.0% royalty + 3.0% ad fund.

Operator retention

System contracting at -2.8% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Personal Care & Beauty medians

How Massage Heights Compares

Metric
Massage Heights
Category median
vs median
Investment
$512K
$402Kmiddle half $261K–$677K · n=112
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.0M
$527Kmiddle half $402K–$892K · n=59
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
104
40middle half 8–151 · n=111
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Personal Care & Beauty brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units104Verified — printed on page 64 of the 2024 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-2.8% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate3.8% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2024 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
104
Opened
5
Last reporting year
Closed
4
Terminated
3
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.8%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-2.8%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-2.8%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
3
Not renewed
1
Transferred
8
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
9
0.09 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
1
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2021
106
Franchised units
2022
102-4
Franchised units
2023
103+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 22.8% charge-off
Total loans
106
Loan volume
$39.9M
Median loan
$345K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
22.8%
on 106 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
77.2%
5-yr charge-off
50.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
41
Defaults
18
Typical loan rate
6.4%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
N/A
NAICS 8121
Jobs supported
2,458
6.2 per loan
Lender concentration
30%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 71% went to startups / new businesses, 29% to established operators

Vintage analysis

Massage Heights charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Massage Heights charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 10 vintages from 2008 to 2020. Rates range from 0.0% to 50.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%'08'10'13'15'17'20

Top lenders financing Massage Heights franchisees

Simmons Bank32 loans—
The Huntington National Bank9 loans—
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association5 loans—

Showing 3 of 41 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Massage Heights from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
10.9%
Avg SBA guarantee
73%
Avg interest rate
6.40%
Avg chargeoff amount
$242K
Lender concentration
30.2%
Job velocity
6.2 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+6.7pp
Jobs supported
2,458

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 30% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
132N/AN/A
29N/AN/A
35N/AN/A
44N/AN/A
53N/AN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas38517.2%
IAIowa12218.2%
CACalifornia8120.0%
GAGeorgia800.0%
FLFlorida700.0%
KSKansas700.0%
MOMissouri500.0%
MIMichigan33100.0%
NCNorth Carolina300.0%
OHOhio300.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2008
6
2009
3
2010
4
2011
2
2012
4
2013
4
2014
10
2015
25
2016
10
2017
7
2018
1
2019
4
2020
4
2021
3
2022
5
2023
7
2024
2
2025
4
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup14 (45%)
New (< 2 yr)8 (26%)
Ownership change6 (19%)
Existing (2+ yr)3 (10%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 22.8% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 4 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 22.8% — 42% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off22.8% · 106 loans
Verdict score45/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNot extracted

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage45Verdict score 45/100
High confidence±4 pts
4149

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

1 pending suit by franchisor against a defaulting former franchisee/guarantor for breach and abandonment (seeking >$1,000,000); 3 prior actions: a franchisee arbitration alleging disability-accommodation-related fraud (franchisee awarded $344,933.15), an area representative's breach-of-contract suit settled via royalty reduction, and a regional developer arbitration over renewal rights (developer awarded $88,137.50 net).

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $9.8M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Showing the headline figures — all 144 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training168 hrs

Source: FDD 2024 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius1 mi
Franchisor can competeYes
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ15 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationSan Antonio, Texas (mediation/litigation venue is the principal city closest to franchisor's principal place of business)
Governing lawTexas
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

1 pending suit by franchisor against a defaulting former franchisee/guarantor for breach and abandonment (seeking >$1,000,000); 3 prior actions: a franchisee arbitration alleging disability-accommodation-related fraud (franchisee awarded $344,933.15), an area representative's breach-of-contract suit settled via royalty reduction, and a regional developer arbitration over renewal rights (developer awarded $88,137.50 net).

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
76 hrs
On-the-job training
91 hrs
Training location
San Antonio, Texas (franchisor headquarters), online, or another designated location, plus on-site/at Retreat training
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee, subject to franchisor approval and site selection guidance
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
AnchorPoint (proprietary operations software) / designated POS system
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: AnchorPoint (proprietary operations software) / designated POS system

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Massage Heights franchise?

The total investment to open a Massage Heights franchise ranges from $472K – $552K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Massage Heights franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Massage Heights FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.0M. The median is $948K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Massage Heights?

Massage Heights is franchised by Massage Heights Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is SWG International, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2024 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Massage Heights FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Massage Heights FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Massage Heights's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Massage Heights has a charge-off rate of 22.8% across 106 loans, meaning 22.8% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Massage Heights franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Massage Heights has 104 total units in the United States, including 103 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 5 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Massage Heights a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Massage Heights as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 45 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Massage Heights, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Personal Care & Beauty franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Personal Care & Beauty category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.