Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Bandag logo

Bandag Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

AutomotiveTNFranchising since 1957
BAbove averageAbove average66/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$357K – $6.5M
Disclosed sales
not disclosed
SBA charge-off
8.3%
on 13 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00231FDD 2026Data QualityStandard71%Pre-opening
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Bandag is an automotive franchise providing commercial tire retreading and repair for truck fleets and trucking operations. Franchisees run a retread plant and service operation managing casings, production, and fleet accounts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Bandag franchise requires a total initial investment of $357K – $6.5M, including a $3K franchise fee. This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. SBA 7(a) loans show a 8.3% charge-off rate across 13 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored3 of 3 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$357K – $6.5M
42nd pct Automotive
Avg gross sales
N/A
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
157
36th pct Automotive
SBA charge-off
8.3%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Automotive · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$357K – $6.5M
Median $368K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$3K – $3K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$112K – $2.3M
Median $40K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Not disclosed
Franchisor makes none
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 6.0%
Ongoing Fees
Not extracted
Median 8.0%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
8.3%
13 loans · Median 12.9%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
157 units
Median 92 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.2%
Median 2.4%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Automotive median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $357K – $6.5M including a $3K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSThis franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 66/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 8.3% across 13 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -5 franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 5 closed) (Item 20).
  • DECLINESystem contracting at -9.9% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Bridgestone Bandag, LLC
Parent company
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (BATO)
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (BSAM)
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Bandag, Incorporated
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chairman and President
Brian Douglas
Incorporated in
IA
HQ
200 4th Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37201
Auditor
KPMG LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$165K
vs $201K prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Brian Douglas
Headquarters
TN
Founded
1957
FDD year
2026
States available
47

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 835% above the typical automotive franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$357K – $6.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$2,500Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$112K – $2.3M

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Bandag: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$3K$3K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$112K$2.3M
Equipment, build-out, other$242K$4.2M
Total initial investment$357K$6.5M

Source: Bandag 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$357K – $6.5M
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$112K – $2.3M
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$3K – $3K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
No royalty fee; Bandag earns revenue from required purcha…
Ad fund
-n/d

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Bandag: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Transfer fee$2K
Renewal fee$1K
Inventory (initial)$32K – $666K
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

Bandag makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Bandag unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundnot set
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $357K–$6.5M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $112K–$2.3M

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$4.6M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

No financial performance representation

This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.

Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Showing the headline figures — all 129 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Disclosure

This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Operator retention

System contracting at -9.9% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Automotive medians

How Bandag Compares

Metric
Bandag
Category median
vs median
Investment
$3.4M
$368Kmiddle half $178K–$858K · n=95
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.0Mmiddle half $695K–$1.8M · n=38
N/A
Unit Count
157
92middle half 23–293 · n=94
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Automotive brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units157Verified — printed on page 38 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-9.9% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate3.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
157
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
5
Terminated
2
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.2%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-9.9%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-9.9%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
2
Not renewed
0
Transferred
1
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
0
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
172
Franchised units
2024
160-12
Franchised units
2025
155-5
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 34 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 34 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Indiana
  • Michigan
  • South Dakota

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

97 current owners across 34 states.

  • CA 10
  • AL 7
  • NC 7
  • FL 6
  • IL 6
  • IN 6
  • GA 5
  • IA 4
  • KY 4
  • MA 4
  • KS 3
  • MI 3
  • +22 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 3 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 8.3% charge-off
Total loans
13
Loan volume
$8.1M
Median loan
$250K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
8.3%
on 13 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
91.7%
5-yr charge-off
N/A
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
9
Defaults
1
Typical loan rate
5.8%
avg rate to borrowers
vs industry
11.1%
brand is below its industry ↓
Jobs supported
97
1.6 per loan
Lender concentration
22%
top lender's share

Top lenders financing Bandag franchisees

Truist Bank2 loans50.0%
First Horizon Bank1 loans0.0%
Wells Fargo Bank National Association1 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 9 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$1.4M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
62

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Bandag from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
2.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
81%
Avg interest rate
5.75%
Avg chargeoff amount
$125K
Lender concentration
22.2%
Job velocity
1.6 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
11.1%
NAICS 326212
Jobs supported
97

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 22% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1Truist Bank2$254K50.0%
2First Horizon Bank1$100K0.0%
3Wells Fargo Bank National Association1$100K0.0%
4MISSINGMAINBANKID1$760K0.0%
5Bank of America, National Association1$250K0.0%
6GE Capital Small Business Finance Corporation1$860K0.0%
7Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company1$903K0.0%
8BankUnited, National Association1$2.9M0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
OHOhio200.0%
FLFlorida100.0%
GAGeorgia100.0%
IAIowa100.0%
MEMaine100.0%
MIMichigan100.0%
NCNorth Carolina11100.0%
OKOklahoma100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1993
3
1994
3
2000
1
2010
1
2012
1

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 8.3% — 48% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off8.3% · 13 loans
Verdict score66/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average66Verdict score 66/100

Bandag presents significant caution-level risk due to declining unit count, opaque financials, unprotected territories, and lack of performance disclosure, making ROI validation impossible for prospective franchisees.

Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

High confidence±6 pts
6072

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation information required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · KPMG LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.2MYr 2: $0.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Financial statements are those of the affiliate guarantor Bridgestone Bandag Franchising, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC), not the operating franchisor. Its only revenue is interest income on a related-party note receivable ($165,108 in 2025; $200,988 in 2024); the sole expense is audit fees of $35,000/yr.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 66 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORUnit count declining 3.1% YoY (157 units) suggests system contraction and potential market saturation or franchisee struggles
  2. 02MEDZero financial transparency: no disclosed average revenue, net income, or royalty rate prevents ROI validation
  3. 03MINORExtremely wide investment range ($356.5K–$6.5M) indicates high variability in unit economics and unclear cost structure
  4. 04MINORNo territory protection exposes franchisees to direct brand competition and cannibalization within service areas
  5. 05MINORLow franchise fee ($2,500) relative to high capex suggests franchisor relies on royalties; hidden fee structure likely
  6. 06MINOR5-year term is shorter than industry standard (typically 10 years), increasing renewal risk and limiting payback periods
  7. 07MEDItem 19 (financial performance representations) not disclosed—cannot validate profitability claims or benchmark performance

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 129 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training176 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ1 year
Right of first refusalℹNo
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ3
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTN
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation information required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
88 hrs
On-the-job training
88 hrs
Training location
BCS Education Center in Muscatine, Iowa and/or Akron, Ohio; online via Bridgestone and Firestone Education Network; field locations
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
Franchisee (with Bandag consent for location)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
BASys
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: BASys

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

100 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 100 contacts · $49
Free preview
(615) 937-••••TN
Unlock all 100 contacts
(863) 547-••••FL
(630) 896-••••IL
(978) 544-••••MA
(205) 808-••••AL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Bandag franchise?

The total investment to open a Bandag franchise ranges from $357K – $6.5M, with an initial franchise fee of $3K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Bandag franchise owners earn?

Bandag makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Bandag?

Bandag is franchised by Bridgestone Bandag, LLC. Its parent company is Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (BATO). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (BSAM). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Bandag FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Bandag FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Bandag's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Bandag has a charge-off rate of 8.3% across 13 loans, meaning 8.3% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Bandag franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Bandag has 157 total units in the United States, including 155 franchised units and 2 company-owned units.

Is Bandag a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Bandag as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 66 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Bandag, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Automotive franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Automotive category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.