Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Arthur Murray Dance Studio logo
FV-00180FDD 2025Data Quality·Excellent95%Pre-opening
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Arthur Murray Dance Studio Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

EducationFLFranchising since 1946CEOGary EdwardsWebsite Report an errorFranchisor? Claim this listing

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

AStrongest tier95/100

Arthur Murray Dance Studio is a franchise teaching ballroom, Latin, and social dance to adults through private and group lessons. Franchisees run a studio managing instructors, lesson packages, and social events.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Arthur Murray Dance Studio franchise requires a total initial investment of $71K – $252K, including a $25K – $100K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $716K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 5.9% charge-off rate across 17 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Data last verified · figures per the 2025 FDD issuance

Overview

Investment
$71K – $252K
22nd pct Education
Avg gross sales
$716K
24th pct Education
Royalty
8.0%
44th pct Education
Units
237
73rd pct Education
SBA charge-off
5.9%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Education · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$71K – $252K
Avg $662K
below avg ↓
Franchise Fee
$25K – $100K
Avg $47K
Liquid Capital Req'd
$0 – $20K
Avg $58K
Avg Revenue
$716K
Avg $865K
below avg ↓
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Avg 7.3%
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Avg 10.5%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
5.9%
Avg 13.5%
below avg ↓
System Size
237 units
Avg 86 units
Turnover Rate
1.7%
Avg 4.4%
Territory
Protected
Exclusive zone granted
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Education avg · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $71K – $252K including a $25K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $716K/year (median $634K).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 95/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 5.9% across 17 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Arthur Murray International, Inc.
Parent company
AMII Acquisition, LLC
Ultimate parent
Clarion Capital Partners, LLC (indirect controller)
Predecessor
Arthur Murray, Inc. (original name until December 31, 1979)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Gary Edwards
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
1077 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Auditor
Templeton
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$16.9M
vs $8.8M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Overview

About

CEO
Gary Edwards
Headquarters
FL
Founded
1946
FDD year
2025
States available
34

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 76% below the typical education franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$71K – $252KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$25,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty + ad fund8.0% + 2.0%
Working capital$0 – $20K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Arthur Murray Dance Studio: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$25K$25K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$0$20K
Equipment, build-out, other$46K$207K
Total initial investment$71K$252K

Source: Arthur Murray Dance Studio 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$71K – $252K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$0 – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$25K – $100K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Arthur Murray Dance Studio: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$150
Transfer fee$5K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 17% below the education norm.

Avg gross sales$716KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 44 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$634KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 44 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross receipts
Sample size216 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Arthur Murray Dance Studio until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$172K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Arthur Murray Dance Studio unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $715,610 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 68%
typ 35%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $71K–$252K (midpoint used)
Item 7 didn't break this out. Enter your pre-opening cash burn

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
EBITDA margin
Total invested
$172K
Payback
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$716K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$634K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross receipts
Sample size
216 outlets
vs category median 16 · large
Range (low → high)
$72K$2.1M
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$303K$1.3M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank24th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank22th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank44th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank73th
vs Education peers
Risk score rank0th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 204 Education brands

Showing the headline figures — all 149 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 4.4x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $716K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 4.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% — below the Education average of 10.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 5.3% CAGR over 3 years across 237 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Education averages

How Arthur Murray Dance Studio Compares

Metric
Arthur Murray Dance Studio
Category Avg
vs Avg
Investment
$162K
$662K
Revenue
$716K
$865K
Unit Count
237
85.848

Is the system healthy?

Total units237Verified — printed on page 50 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+5.3%
Turnover rate1.7%

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
237
Opened
11
Last reporting year
Closed
4
Terminated
1
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
1.7%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+5.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+5.3%
Compounded over last 3 years

3-year detail · Item 20

Opened (3yr)
27
Closed (3yr)
6
Terminated (3yr)
1
Non-renewed (3yr)
0
Transfers (3yr)
28
Reacquired (3yr)
0
Franchisor bought back
2022
225
Franchised units
2023
230+5
Franchised units
2024
237+7
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 33 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 33 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • California
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • Virginia
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 5.9% charge-off
Total loans
17
Loan volume
$2.2M
Median loan
$80K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
5.9%
rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
94.1%
5-yr charge-off
N/A
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
14
Defaults
1
Typical loan rate
5.4%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
8.5%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
102
4.7 per loan
Lender concentration
18%
top lender's share

Franchise vs independent — in fine arts schools, franchised businesses charge off at 8.5% vs 14.1% for independents — franchising is associated with 40% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Arthur Murray Dance Studio franchisees

Fifth Third Bank3 loans0.0%
Eastern Bank2 loans0.0%
PNC Bank, National Association1 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 14 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
9
Loan volume
$3.7M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
90

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Premium insight

SBA Lending Report

Deep-dive into Arthur Murray Dance Studio's SBA lending history: lender network, geographic footprint, interest rates, and more.

SBA Lending Report

  • Principal loss rate and NAICS industry benchmark
  • 10 lenders with concentration factor
  • Per-state charge-off rates across 11 states
  • Startup risk premium and job creation velocity
  • 12-year lending trend
  • SBA 504 real estate/equipment data
$29 one-time

Instant access. No subscription.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 5.9% — 63% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off5.9%
Verdict score95/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Going concernClear

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier95Verdict score 95/100

Aging brand with regulatory baggage, opaque profitability metrics, stagnant unit growth, and recent franchisee disputes creates elevated risk despite protected territory.

High confidence±3 pts
2127

Litigation (Item 3)

Arthur Murray International v. Gisella West et al. (AAA Case No. 01-24-0004-5787): demand for arbitration filed April 2024 against former franchisee for unpaid royalties and injunctive relief; consent award entered September 2024. FTC Consent Decree (Docket 7845, amended 1980) requires specific student cancellation rights and disclosures.

Largest disclosed settlement: $1,000

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Templeton

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $16.9MYr 2: $8.8MNon-royalty: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Fiscal year end changed from June 30 to December 31 after the Dec 4, 2024 AMII Acquisition. The most recent audited period (yr1) is the Successor stub period from Dec 4, 2024 (Inception) through Dec 31, 2024 only (~28 days): total revenue $1,361,728, net income $501,344. The June 30, 2024 fiscal-year figures ($16,879,800 total revenue, $3,113,700 net income) are Predecessor full-year results and are used here as yr2. A separate Predecessor stub period (July 1, 2024 - Dec 3, 2024) had total revenue $7,585,328 and net income $727,824. Balance sheet figures (assets/liabilities/equity) are as of Dec 31, 2024 (Successor) and reflect purchase accounting from the acquisition (goodwill $19,342,214, intangibles $26,974,715, debt $27,900,074).

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 95 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOR1980 FTC Consent Decree still active — indicates ongoing regulatory scrutiny for unfair/deceptive practices in sales and contracts
  2. 02MEDNo Item 19 (Average Net Income) disclosed — cannot verify profitability claims; $715K avg revenue without net income transparency is concerning
  3. 03MEDDeclining unit count (237 units, only 3.0% YoY growth) — suggests market saturation, franchisee struggles, or brand decline
  4. 04MINORRecent 2024 arbitration filing against Honolulu franchisee for unpaid royalties — signals enforcement issues and potential franchisee financial distress
  5. 05MINORHigh royalty burden (5-10% of weekly gross) on dance studio margins — may compress profitability significantly
  6. 06MED5-year term with no disclosed renewal rates or franchise failure data — unclear exit strategy for underperforming locations

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 149 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryNot exclusive
Initial training95 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Territory typeprotected
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryNo
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)2 years
Non-compete (miles)25 mi
Right of first refusalYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationCoral Gables, Florida
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawFL
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Arthur Murray International v. Gisella West et al. (AAA Case No. 01-24-0004-5787): demand for arbitration filed April 2024 against former franchisee for unpaid royalties and injunctive relief; consent award entered September 2024. FTC Consent Decree (Docket 7845, amended 1980) requires specific student cancellation rights and disclosures.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
15 hrs
On-the-job training
80 hrs
Training location
Coral Gables, Florida (or other agreed upon location)
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee selects; franchisor must approve location
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Agenda Master Software
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

Site selection assistance
Grand opening support
Lease negotiation help

Technology: Agenda Master Software

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

236 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 236 contacts · $49
Free preview
410-451-••••MD
Unlock all 236 contacts
212-473-••••NY
360-699-••••WA
781-686-••••MA
614-847-••••OH

FDD download

Arthur Murray Dance Studio · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Arthur Murray Dance Studio franchise?

The total investment to open a Arthur Murray Dance Studio franchise ranges from $71K – $252K, with an initial franchise fee of $25K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Arthur Murray Dance Studio franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Arthur Murray Dance Studio FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $716K. The median is $634K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

What is Item 19 in the Arthur Murray Dance Studio FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Arthur Murray Dance Studio FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Arthur Murray Dance Studio's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Arthur Murray Dance Studio has a charge-off rate of 5.9% across 17 loans, meaning 5.9% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Arthur Murray Dance Studio franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Arthur Murray Dance Studio has 237 total units in the United States, including 237 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 11 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Arthur Murray Dance Studio a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Arthur Murray Dance Studio as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 95 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Arthur Murray Dance Studio, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Education franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Education category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.