Bottom line
- Total investment $1.1M – $3.0M including a $60K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
- No Item 19 financial performance data disclosed — the franchisor chose not to publish revenue figures.
- Rated CAUTION with a risk score of 75/100.
- No Item 19 financial performance representation. Without franchisor-disclosed revenue data, you'll need to gather unit economics directly from existing franchisees.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one Conquer Padel Club unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
5%
Below typical band (30–60%)
Overview
About
Franchisees operate padel tennis club facilities, managing court bookings, memberships, coaching services, and events. Daily operations include facility maintenance, staff scheduling, member acquisition, and league/tournament coordination. Revenue is generated through court rental fees, membership packages, and ancillary services (food/beverage, lessons).
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
This franchisor did not disclose financial performance representations in Item 19, or our extractor could not parse them.
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 17 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
No SBA loan data available for this brand.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
Zero operating franchised units, missing financial disclosures, going concern issues, and capital-intensive model with no validated unit economics present extreme risk of franchisor failure and franchisee capital loss.
Score breakdown · what drove the 75 / 100 rating
- 01MINORZero franchised units despite offering franchise since unknown date—suggests failed or non-existent franchise system
- 02HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE, indicating potential financial distress or instability at franchisor level
- 03MEDNo average revenue or net income disclosed (missing Item 19)—impossible to validate ROI or unit economics
- 04MINORExtremely high capital requirement ($1.1M–$3M) with no performance benchmarks to justify cost
- 05MED7% royalty on undisclosed revenue creates unknown ongoing burden with no baseline for profitability
- 06MEDNo disclosed unit growth trajectory or comparable franchise units for reference checking
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
17 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
Conquer Padel Club · FDD (2025) PDF