United Water Restoration Group vs Paul Davis Restoration
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both United Water Restoration Group and Paul Davis Restoration are cleaning & maintenance franchises. United Water Restoration Group requires an investment of $223K – $700K while Paul Davis Restoration requires $299K – $805K. In terms of revenue, Paul Davis Restoration reports higher average unit revenue at $4.8M. On SBA loan performance, United Water Restoration Group has a lower charge-off rate (3.7%) compared to Paul Davis Restoration (8.9%). FranchiseVerdict rates United Water Restoration Group A (Top Quintile) and Paul Davis Restoration A (Top Quintile).
| Metric | United Water Restoration Group | Paul Davis Restoration |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | ATop QuintileTop Quintile | ATop QuintileTop Quintile |
| Investment Range | $223K – $700K | $299K – $805K |
| Franchise Fee | $49K | $65K |
| Royalty Rate | Restoration/Remediation Services: 6% of Collected Revenue; Reconstruction Services: 2% of Collected Revenue | 4.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $1.9M | $4.8M |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 3.7% (27 loans) | 8.9% (178 loans) |
| Total Units | 49 | 277 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2015 | 1970 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2026 |
United Water Restoration Group
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
Paul Davis Restoration
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
Investment Range
$223K – $700K
$299K – $805K
Franchise Fee
$49K
$65K
Royalty Rate
Restoration/Remediation Services: 6% of Collected Revenue; Reconstruction Services: 2% of Collected Revenue
4.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$1.9M
$4.8M
SBA Charge-Off Rate
3.7% (27 loans)
8.9% (178 loans)
Total Units
49
277
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2015
1970
FDD Year
2025
2026