Paul Davis Restoration vs United Water Restoration Group
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Paul Davis Restoration and United Water Restoration Group are cleaning & maintenance franchises. Paul Davis Restoration requires an investment of $299K – $805K while United Water Restoration Group requires $223K – $700K. In terms of revenue, Paul Davis Restoration reports higher average unit revenue at $4.8M. On SBA loan performance, United Water Restoration Group has a lower charge-off rate (3.7%) compared to Paul Davis Restoration (8.9%). FranchiseVerdict rates Paul Davis Restoration A (Top Quintile) and United Water Restoration Group A (Top Quintile).
| Metric | Paul Davis Restoration | United Water Restoration Group |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | ATop QuintileTop Quintile | ATop QuintileTop Quintile |
| Investment Range | $299K – $805K | $223K – $700K |
| Franchise Fee | $65K | $49K |
| Royalty Rate | 4.0% | Restoration/Remediation Services: 6% of Collected Revenue; Reconstruction Services: 2% of Collected Revenue |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $4.8M | $1.9M |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 8.9% (178 loans) | 3.7% (27 loans) |
| Total Units | 277 | 49 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 1970 | 2015 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2025 |
Paul Davis Restoration
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
United Water Restoration Group
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
Investment Range
$299K – $805K
$223K – $700K
Franchise Fee
$65K
$49K
Royalty Rate
4.0%
Restoration/Remediation Services: 6% of Collected Revenue; Reconstruction Services: 2% of Collected Revenue
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$4.8M
$1.9M
SBA Charge-Off Rate
8.9% (178 loans)
3.7% (27 loans)
Total Units
277
49
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
1970
2015
FDD Year
2026
2025