Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham vs Tru by Hilton
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham and Tru by Hilton are lodging franchises. Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham requires an investment of $12.6M – $15.3M while Tru by Hilton requires $11.7M – $17.2M. On SBA loan performance, Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham has a lower charge-off rate (0.0%) compared to Tru by Hilton (0.0%). FranchiseVerdict rates Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham A (Strongest tier) and Tru by Hilton A (Strongest tier).
| Metric | Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham | Tru by Hilton |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | AStrongest tierStrongest tier | AStrongest tierStrongest tier |
| Investment Range | $12.6M – $15.3M | $11.7M – $17.2M |
| Franchise Fee | $40K | $100K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.5% | 5.0% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | N/AOutlet subset | N/A |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 0.0% (16 loans) | 0.0% (40 loans) |
| Total Units | 82 | 231 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 1996 | 2015 |
| FDD Year | 2026 | 2023 |
Hawthorn Extended Stay by Wyndham
AStrongest tierStrongest tier
Tru by Hilton
AStrongest tierStrongest tier
Investment Range
$12.6M – $15.3M
$11.7M – $17.2M
Franchise Fee
$40K
$100K
Royalty Rate
5.5%
5.0%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
N/AOutlet subset
N/A
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0% (16 loans)
0.0% (40 loans)
Total Units
82
231
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
1996
2015
FDD Year
2026
2023