Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream logo

Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Full-Service RestaurantsFLFranchising since 2012
DBelow averageBelow average36/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$173K – $185K
Disclosed sales
not disclosed
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02739Data QualityExcellent81%FDD 2023 · 3yr old
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

This data is from a 2023 FDD. Current terms may differ. Always verify with the franchisor's latest disclosure document.

Tikiz is a mobile dessert franchise serving shaved ice and ice cream from branded, music-playing trucks at events and neighborhoods. Franchisees run the trucks, managing bookings, flavor inventory, and event service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream franchise requires a total initial investment of $173K – $185K, including a $20K franchise fee. This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: high - issued more than two years ago

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored3 of 3 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$173K – $185K
6th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
40
26th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$173K – $185K
Median $678K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$20K – $20K
Median $40K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$1K – $4K
Median $43K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Not disclosed
Franchisor makes none
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 5.0%
Ongoing Fees
Not extracted
Median 7.0%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
40 units
Median 20 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
10.0%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $173K – $185K including a $20K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSThis franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 36/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +7 franchised outlets in the latest year (11 opened, 4 closed); 14 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 48.1% CAGR over 3 years with 40 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Tikiz Franchising, LLC
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and President
Brian Tollefson
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
FL
HQ
1021 S. Rogers Circle, Suite 1, Boca Raton, FL 33487
Auditor
Arie A. Taykan & Company, CPA's
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$473K
vs $812K prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
Brian Tollefson
Headquarters
FL
Founded
2012
FDD year
2023
States available
11

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 74% below the typical full-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$173K – $185KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 18 of the 2023 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$20,000Verified — printed on page 10 of the 2023 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$1K – $4K

Source: FDD 2023 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2023 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$20K$20K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$1K$4K
Equipment, build-out, other$152K$161K
Total initial investment$173K$185K

Source: Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream 2023 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$173K – $185K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$1K – $4K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$20K – $20K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
$500 per month
Ad fund
$250

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty (flat)$500 per month
Technology fee$150
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$25
Inventory (initial)$2K – $3K
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundnot set
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $173K–$185K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $1K–$4K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$181K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2023 FDD

Financial Performance

No financial performance representation

This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that.

Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Showing the headline figures — all 135 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Disclosure

This franchisor makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD. Item 19 is voluntary under the FTC Franchise Rule, and this filing states that it makes none, so no revenue or earnings figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Operator retention

System expanding at 48.1% CAGR over 3 years across 40 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Multi-unit rate

Only 25% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Full-Service Restaurants medians

How Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream Compares

Metric
Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream
Category median
vs median
Investment
$179K
$678Kmiddle half $427K–$1.3M · n=326
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.6Mmiddle half $885K–$2.4M · n=122
N/A
Unit Count
40
20middle half 6–73 · n=308
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units40Verified — printed on page 46 of the 2023 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+48.1% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate10.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2023 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
40
Opened
11
Last reporting year
Closed
4
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
10.0%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
95%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
25.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
+48.1%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+48.1%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
14
0.35 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
24
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Ceased ops
10.0%
Units that stopped operating
2020
30
Franchised units
2021
31+1
Franchised units
2022
38+7
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 14 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 14 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

29 current owners across 14 states.

  • CA 6
  • FL 6
  • TX 4
  • KY 2
  • NC 2
  • AL 1
  • IL 1
  • LA 1
  • MN 1
  • MS 1
  • NM 1
  • OH 1
  • +2 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score36/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average36Verdict score 36/100

Mobile ice cream franchisor (40 units) with a large negative equity of -$977,956, a net loss of -$357,015, plus an active patent dispute with Kona Ice (summary judgment partly against Tikiz, pending appeal) and a prior suit. Item 19 not disclosed. Multiple financial and litigation concerns stack here.

Low confidence±16 pts
2052

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Tikiz Franchising, LLC and Tikiz Enterprises, LLC v. Kona Ice, Inc. - Patent infringement dispute involving U.S. Patent Nos. 9,751,447 and 9,321,387. Case No. 0:18-md-02832-KMM (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida). Tikiz filed for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and patent invalidity. Kona Ice filed counterclaim. 18 patent infringement actions filed by Kona Ice against franchisees in September 2017, with 13 remaining pending and consolidated with main action. Claims regarding U.S. Patent No. 9,321,387 resolved. Summary judgment entered July 31, 2023 in favor of Kona Ice on counterclaim. Trial date not set as of disclosure date. Tikiz changed design feature in September 2021; Kona Ice has not asserted claims on revised feature.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Arie A. Taykan & Company, CPA's

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.5MYr 2: $0.8MTotal: $1.6MNon-royalty: $1.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 36 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$977,956 and net loss -$357,015
  2. 02HIGHActive patent litigation vs Kona Ice (partial SJ against Tikiz, on appeal) plus prior suit
  3. 03MEDItem 19 not disclosed

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 135 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training28 hrs

Source: FDD 2023 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population200,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice15 days
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawFlorida
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

Tikiz Franchising, LLC and Tikiz Enterprises, LLC v. Kona Ice, Inc. - Patent infringement dispute involving U.S. Patent Nos. 9,751,447 and 9,321,387. Case No. 0:18-md-02832-KMM (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida). Tikiz filed for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and patent invalidity. Kona Ice filed counterclaim. 18 patent infringement actions filed by Kona Ice against franchisees in September 2017, with 13 remaining pending and consolidated with main action. Claims regarding U.S. Patent No. 9,321,387 resolved. Summary judgment entered July 31, 2023 in favor of Kona Ice on counterclaim. Trial date not set as of disclosure date. Tikiz changed design feature in September 2021; Kona Ice has not asserted claims on revised feature.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
12 hrs
On-the-job training
16 hrs
Training location
On-site and corporate
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisee proposes, franchisor consents
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Customer Software Program
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Customer Software Program

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

29 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 29 contacts · $49
Free preview
(859) 445-••••KY
Unlock all 29 contacts
(661) 993-••••CA
(714) 296-••••CA
(415) 627-••••CA
(502) 554-••••KY

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream franchise?

The total investment to open a Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream franchise ranges from $173K – $185K, with an initial franchise fee of $20K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream franchise owners earn?

Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream makes no financial performance representation in Item 19 of its FDD - a voluntary item under the FTC Franchise Rule - so no unit revenue figures are disclosed. Declining to publish one is lawful and is not evidence of how the outlets perform. It does mean that less about this brand can be verified from its filing, and the FranchiseVerdict grade - an editorial assessment, not investment advice - reflects that. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream?

Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream is franchised by Tikiz Franchising, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2023 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream has 40 total units in the United States, including 38 franchised units and 2 company-owned units. 11 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 36 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Tikiz Shaved Ice and Ice Cream, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.