Junk King litigation history

The franchisor and its predecessor

Concluded (3)

• Rondale, Inc. vs. Junk King Franchise Systems, Inc.

  settled

  Brought by a franchisee · filed 2019 · American Arbitration Association · 01-19-0001-1633

  “The plaintiff, one of our area representatives, alleged that JKFSI breached its agreement by failing to report and share fees generated by a franchisee that operated in its territory and by failing to provide the plaintiff with an opportunity to exercise an option to purchase additional territory. The plaintiff sought $999,999 i”Page 23 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “On February 28, 2020, the parties entered into a settlement agreement in which, (i) neither party admitted any wrongdoing, (ii) the arbitration was dismissed with prejudice, (iii) the parties mutually released all claims against each other, (iv) we repurchased the area representative’s territorial rights, terminating all agreeme”

• JK Georgia LLC and JNKK Enterprises LLC v. Junk King Franchise Systems, Inc.

  settled

  Brought by a franchisee · Junk King Franchise Systems, Inc. ('JKFSI') · filed 2017 · Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo · 17CIV04821

  “The plaintiffs, former franchisees, sought unspecified general, consequential, and incidental damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, rescission of the Franchise Agreement, an injunction, and a declaratory judgment. The plaintiffs asserted claims of breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, v”Page 23 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “The complaint was dismissed with prejudice on March 12, 2018 after the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby JKFSI agreed to (i) pay $110,000 to JK Georgia LLC, (ii) assume JK Georgia LLC’s truck loans, and (iii) repurchase the territory and assets from JNKK Enterprises LLC for an initial payment of $15,000 and $13”

• Sidney J. Dumas, Sand Pointe Properties, LLC, ECO-X-PRESS, LLC v. Junk King Franchise Systems, Inc.

  settled

  Brought by a franchisee · Junk King Franchise Systems, Inc. ('JKFSI') · filed 2015 · American Arbitration Association · 01-15-0005-3308

  “The plaintiffs, former franchisees, sought unspecified damages, general, economic, compensatory, special damages, punitive damages, costs and attorney fees in excess of $75,000 claiming that, as amended, JKFSI caused them to purchase a franchise as a result of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, promissory fraud, and also commit”Page 23 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “On February 28, 2020, the parties entered into a settlement agreement in which the parties mutually released all claims against each other and agreed to dismiss the arbitration with prejudice by May 3, 2020. Rondale, Inc. vs. Junk”

Status not stated in the filing (2)

• Junk King SPV LLC as successor in interest to Junk King Franchise Systems, LLC v. Eby Management Incorporated, David Lee Eby Jr., and Joan E. Eby

  Brought against a franchisee · filed 2025-01-23 · thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, Florida · 25-CA-000535

  “… Case No. 25-CA-000535, file on January 23, 2025, in the thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough Count”Page 24 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

• Donkae, Inc. v. Junk King SPV LLC

  Brought by a franchisee · filed 2023 · circuit court of the sixth judicial circuit in Pinellas County, FL · 23009285CI

  “Plaintiff then sued us in this action after we terminated EBY Management’s franchise rights. Plaintiff alleges tortious interference, civil conspiracy and fraudulent misrepresentation and seeks actual, consequential, and special damages, including lost profits, in an amount to be determined at trial, as well as a perma”Page 22 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

Parent, affiliates, master franchisor and subfranchisor

Concluded (1)

• The Commissioner of Business Oversight of the State of California v. FOR Franchising LLC d/b/a Window Genie and Richard Nonelle

  concluded

  Government or regulatory action · FOR Franchising LLC d/b/a Window Genie, 'a predecessor to our affiliate Window Genie', and Richard Nonelle, then-president of FOR · filed 2017-11-14 · Commissioner of Business Oversight of the State of California

  “The Commissioner alleged that FOR and Mr. Nonelle had violated Section 31156 of the California Franchise Investment Law by failing to submit to the Commissioner copies of two advertisements offering a Window Genie franchise before such documents were provided to California residents in 2013. In an effort to resolve the matter in”Page 24 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

  Outcome: “would pay an administrative penalty in the total amount of $5,000 (which amount FOR paid) and (c) within 90 days of the date of the Consent Order, Mr. Nonelle and all persons employed by FOR who assis”