Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Arctic Elevation logo

Arctic Elevation Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

HealthcareWAFranchising since 2024
BAbove averageAbove average51/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$309K – $708K
Disclosed sales
$612K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-20832FDD 2025Data QualityStandard71%Pre-opening
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Arctic Elevation is a wellness franchise offering recovery and pain-relief treatments to optimize physical and mental well-being. Franchisees run the centers, managing equipment, sessions, and memberships.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Arctic Elevation franchise requires a total initial investment of $309K – $708K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $612K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2024. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2025 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - a newer filing may exist

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$309K – $708K
58th pct Healthcare
Avg gross sales
$612K
Incl. company outlets13th pct Healthcare
Royalty
8.0%
57th pct Healthcare
Units
9
28th pct Healthcare
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Healthcare · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$309K – $708K
Median $321K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $50K
Median $40K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$612K
Median $676K
near median
Incl. company outlets
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
2.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
9 units
Median 23 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Healthcare median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $309K – $708K including a $60K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $612K/year (median $621K) (includes company-owned outlets).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 51/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +3 franchised outlets in the latest year (1 opened, 0 closed); 4 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • EARLYEmerging franchise: only 2 years of franchising with 9 units. Early-stage systems carry higher risk but may offer better territory availability.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Arctic Franchising LLC
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Member
David Kostroub
Incorporated in
WA
HQ
1133 Lake Washington Blvd N, Ste. 80, Renton, WA 98056
Auditor
A&G LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$575K
Most recent fiscal year

Affiliated brands

  • Arctic Elevation

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
David Kostroub
Headquarters
WA
Founded
2024
FDD year
2025
States available
2

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 58% above the typical healthcare franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$309K – $708KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,500Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $50K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

published investment is a single Arctic Elevation wellness center. The franchisor also offers an area-representative grant under a separate FDD (Arctic_WI.pdf, 2026): fee $100,000-$650,000, estimated initial investment $177,250-$762,500; that offering is not priced on this page.

Full Item 7 breakdown18 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee (Note A)$60K$60K
Training Expenses (Note B)$1K$2K
Real Property (Note C)$3K$10K
Equipment (Note D)$120K$220K
Fixtures, other fixed assets, remodeling, and decorating costs (Note E)$12K$22K
Inventory to Begin Operating (Note F)$1K$5K
Security Deposits, utility deposits, business licenses and other prepaid expenses (Note G)$5K$15K
Leasehold Improvements (Note H)$70K$250K
Architectural and Engineering (Note I)$10K$20K
Computer Hardware & Software$2K$4K
Signage$2K$13K
Supplies & Misc.$200$800
Pre-Launch Marketing$5K$5K
Launch Marketing$5K$10K
Additional Training (Note K)$0$1K
Insurance (Note L)$3K$7K
Legal & Accounting Fees (Note M)$1K$15K
Additional Funds - 6 months (Note N)$10K$50K
Total initial investment$309K$708K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$309K – $708K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
2.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Arctic Elevation: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0%
Technology fee$499
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$0
Inventory (initial)$1K – $5K
Total fee load2.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 2.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 9% below the healthcare norm.

Avg gross sales$612K

Includes company-owned outlets

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 61 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$621KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 61 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeHistorical Average/Median/…
Sample size3 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Arctic Elevation until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$538K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Arctic Elevation unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $611,898 per unit — Includes company-owned outlets. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $309K–$708K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$50K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$538K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Includes company-owned outlets

Avg gross sales
$612K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$621K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Historical Average/Median/Lowest/Highest Gross Sales for the 12 months ended September 30, 2025 for the 3 Arctic Elevation studios (1 affiliate-owned, 2 franchised) open at least one year; also average/median/lowest/highest active-member counts
Sample size
3 outlets
vs category median 20 · small
Range (low → high)
$392K→$814KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 61 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
The FDD edition these figures were read from
Gross sales rank13th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank58th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank57th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank28th
vs Healthcare peers
Risk score rank46th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 162 Healthcare brands

Showing the headline figures — all 123 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $612K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.2x. Includes company-owned outlets.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 2.0% — below the Healthcare median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 0/10 — minimal disclosure beyond the required average. Hard to judge the distribution of outcomes across units. Sample size of 3 outlets — treat as directional only.

Operator retention

Net unit growth of +50.0% over 3 years (1 opened, 0 closed).

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Healthcare medians

How Arctic Elevation Compares

Metric
Arctic Elevation
Category median
vs median
Investment
$508K
$321Kmiddle half $178K–$530K · n=133
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$612K
$676Kmiddle half $496K–$929K · n=48
Near median
Unit Count
9
23middle half 5–101 · n=132
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Healthcare brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units9Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 62 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth+50.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
9
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+50.0%
Net unit change over 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
4
0.44 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
15
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
0
Franchised units
2023
3+3
Franchised units
2024
6+3
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 4 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Indiana
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

4 current owners across 4 states.

  • CA 1
  • FL 1
  • NM 1
  • WA 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score51/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average51Verdict score 51/100
Low confidence±15 pts
3666

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

Item 3 states that no litigation is required to be disclosed. No pending action, prior action or government proceeding is listed against the franchisor or any Item 2 person.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · A&G LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.6M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Audited financial statements of Arctic Franchising LLC (the franchisor itself; no parent) as of and for the first fiscal period August 1, 2024 through July 31, 2025, audit opinion by Drenchko Stephanie, CPA (Ballston Lake, NY); Exhibit B pages are image-only and the statement footers say 'independent accountant's review report' although the report is an audit opinion.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 51 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORExtremely high royalty fee at 50% of standard rate is unsustainably extractive and suggests franchisor cash flow desperation
  2. 02MINORTiny system size (only 3 units) with 50% YoY growth is statistically insignificant and indicates pre-scale/unproven concept

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 123 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 2.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training44 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population2,000,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ300 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationKing County, Washington
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawWA
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

Item 3 states that no litigation is required to be disclosed. No pending action, prior action or government proceeding is listed against the franchisor or any Item 2 person.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
16 hrs
On-the-job training
28 hrs
Training location
Online/Remote modules; Arctic Franchising Headquarters or Company-Owned Unit in Renton, WA; Franchisee New Unit
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
6 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

4 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 4 contacts · $49
Free preview
(505) 500-••••NM
Unlock all 4 contacts
(916) 970-••••CA
(850) 865-••••FL
(425) 400-••••WA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Arctic Elevation franchise?

The total investment to open a Arctic Elevation franchise ranges from $309K – $708K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Arctic Elevation franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Arctic Elevation FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $612K. The median is $621K. Important context: Includes company-owned outlets. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Arctic Elevation?

Arctic Elevation is franchised by Arctic Franchising LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Arctic Elevation FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Arctic Elevation FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Arctic Elevation's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Arctic Elevation (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Arctic Elevation franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Arctic Elevation has 9 total units in the United States, including 6 franchised units and 3 company-owned units. 1 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Arctic Elevation a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Arctic Elevation as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 51 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Arctic Elevation, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Healthcare franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Healthcare category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.