Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO logo

Mr. Charlie’s Told Me So Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Full-Service RestaurantsCAFranchising since 2024
DBelow averageBelow average30/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$283K – $698K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01702FDD 2025Data QualityStandard76%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Mr. Charlie's Told Me So is a fast-food franchise serving plant-based hamburgers, plant-based chicken sandwiches, and meatless menu items from restaurants and food trucks. Franchisees run the locations, managing food prep, staffing, and service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO franchise requires a total initial investment of $283K – $698K, including a $35K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2024. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: partial✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$283K – $698K
12th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Company-owned onlyn=2
Royalty
5.0%
8th pct Service Resta…
Units
2
4th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Full-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$283K – $698K
Median $678K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$35K – $35K
Median $40K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$15K – $35K
Median $43K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
2 units
Median 20 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Full-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $283K – $698K including a $35K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 30/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGItem 4 discloses a bankruptcy of an officer or of a company an officer ran, not of the franchisor. Review Item 4 for details.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Mr. Charlie's World LLC
Parent company
Sona Terra Inc.
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
David Shneer
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
CA
HQ
450 North Bedford Drive, Suite 312, Beverly Hills, California 90210
Auditor
Metwally CPA PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$13K
Most recent fiscal year

Overview

About

CEO
David Shneer
Headquarters
CA
Founded
2022
FDD year
2025
States available
0

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 28% below the typical full-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$283K – $698KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 18 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$35,000Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$15K – $35K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown20 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$35K$35K
Security Deposit$5K$5K
Initial Training Expenses 2$500$10K
Food Handler Certification 3$200$500
Lease Deposit & Rent (3 months) 4$12K$80K
Architect Fees$9K$11K
Construction 6$100K$300K
Exterior & Interior Signage 7$15K$30K
Furniture, Fixtures & Décor$9K$20K
Technology Systems 8$9K$18K
Kitchen Equipment 9$32K$57K
Employee Uniforms$3K$4K
Opening Inventory 10$23K$52K
Grand Opening Advertising 11$5K$12K
Office Supplies$500$900
Utility Deposits$4K$5K
Business Licenses & Permits$2K$6K
Professional Fees 12$5K$16K
Insurance Premium (3 months)$600$1K
Additional Funds (3 months) 13$15K$35K
Total initial investment$283K$698K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$283K – $698K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$15K – $35K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$35K – $35K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$150
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$18K
Inventory (initial)$23K – $52K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size2

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $283K–$698K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $15K–$35K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$515K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Based on a sample of only 2

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
2
vs category median 18 · small
Range (low → high)
$1.2M→$1.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 45 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
3 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank12th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank8th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank4th
vs Full-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank84th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 801 Full-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Full-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Full-Service Restaurants medians

How Mr. Charlie’s Told Me So Compares

Metric
Mr. Charlie’s Told Me So
Category median
vs median
Investment
$490K
$678Kmiddle half $427K–$1.3M · n=326
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$1.6Mmiddle half $885K–$2.4M · n=122
N/A
Unit Count
2
20middle half 6–73 · n=308
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Full-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units2Verified — printed on page 46 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
2
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
1
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
0
Franchised units
2023
0±0
Franchised units
2024
0±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score30/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average30Verdict score 30/100
Low confidence±15 pts
1545

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Tustin Legacy, LLC v. Aaron Haxton, Taylor Mckinnon & Mr. Charlie Told Me So LLC (Cal. Super. Ct., Case No. 248MCV00901). Filed Feb 27, 2024. Corporate dispute re: alleged 25% ownership interest in affiliate MCTMS; compensatory damages sought of at least $1,200,000. Defendants filed cross-complaint. Case pending.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: an officer. An officer’s own bankruptcy or a company an officer ran, not the franchisor’s

Amanda Marie Mckinnon and Antonio David Mckinnon filed Chapter 7 (Case No. 2:19-bk-13970-BB, Bankr. C.D. Cal.) on April 8, 2019; discharged July 24, 2019. Taylor Mckinnon (Co-Founder and Chief Marketing Officer) joined as Joint Debtor after spouse's medical issue. No other bankruptcy disclosed.

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Metwally CPA PLLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Figures from the AUDITED financial statements of Mr. Charlie's World, LLC (the franchisor entity Item 21 relies on), audited by Metwally CPA PLLC, for the inception period July 23, 2024 to December 31, 2024. Statements are in whole US dollars (not scaled); balance sheet reconciles (Assets 232,408 = Liabilities 71,062 + Members' Equity 161,346). Total Revenues of $13,013 consist entirely of Initial franchise fees. yr2 is null (first/inception period, no prior year). Note: pages p126-p127 show an UNAUDITED interim balance sheet/statement of operations as of June 30, 2025 (Mr. Charlies World LLC) explicitly marked "prepared without an audit"; those were not used.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 30 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOROnly 2 units in system with unknown growth trajectory suggests stagnant or shrinking franchise network
  2. 02HIGHActive litigation involving ownership disputes and alleged fund diversion raises governance and financial integrity concerns
  3. 03MINORHigh investment range ($282K-$697K) relative to tiny 2-unit system increases franchisee risk significantly
  4. 04MINOR5% royalty on gross sales (not net) means franchisor profits even when franchisees lose money

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training44 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius2 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice10 days
Curable defaultsℹ4
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationLos Angeles County, California
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawCA
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Tustin Legacy, LLC v. Aaron Haxton, Taylor Mckinnon & Mr. Charlie Told Me So LLC (Cal. Super. Ct., Case No. 248MCV00901). Filed Feb 27, 2024. Corporate dispute re: alleged 25% ownership interest in affiliate MCTMS; compensatory damages sought of at least $1,200,000. Defendants filed cross-complaint. Case pending.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
44 hrs
On-the-job training
120 hrs
Training location
San Francisco or Los Angeles, California (company-owned Restaurant)
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
120 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
8 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee with franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Toast
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Toast

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO franchise?

The total investment to open a MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO franchise ranges from $283K – $698K, with an initial franchise fee of $35K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO FDD discloses outlet figures from $1.2M to $1.5M but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO?

MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO is franchised by Mr. Charlie's World LLC. Its parent company is Sona Terra Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO has 2 total units in the United States.

Is MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 30 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent MR. CHARLIE’S TOLD ME SO, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Full-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Full-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.