Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2026 filing

Einstein Bros. Bagels litigation history

What Einstein Bros. Bagels disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
4
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2026
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

Three pending cases as of the FDD date: (1) GKFC-Laurelwood, LLC v. Einstein and Noah Corp. (Colorado state court, Feb 2026) - promissory estoppel/detrimental reliance over a terminated location; (2) Einstein Bros. Bagels Franchise Corp. v. Waleed Mansour, Superwings, Inc., and Bagel Genius, Inc. (D. Colo., Oct 2025) - franchisor-initiated suit for breach of Area Development Agreement; (3) Bagel Genius, Inc., Superwings, Inc., and Waleed Mansour v. Einstein Bros. Bagels Franchise Corp. (Cal. Superior Court, Oct 2025) - franchisee counter-suit alleging fraud, misrepresentation, and related claims arising from the same Area Development Agreement dispute. Additionally, a franchisor-initiated trademark infringement action: Einstein Bros. Bagel Franchise Corp. and Einstein and Noah Corp. v. J.F.C Management Holdings, LLC and Ramona D. Hall (D. Colo., filed Dec 2024).

Item 3 (litigation) · 4 matters disclosed · 3 pending listed

Litigation cases

The franchisor and its predecessor

Pending (3)

  • GKFC-Laurelwood, LLC v. Einstein and Noah Corp., doing business as, Einstein Bros Bagels

    pending

    Brought by a franchisee · Einstein and Noah Corp. (ENC, our predecessor; the text says 'us') · filed 2026-02-09 · District Court, Jefferson County, Colorado · 2026CV30235

    “… District Court, Jefferson County, Colorado, Case Number: 2026CV30235, Filed on February 9, 2026.”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3
  • Bagel Genius, Inc., Superwings, Inc., and Waleed Mansour v. Einstein Bros. Bagels Franchise Corporation, Inc.

    pending

    Brought by a franchisee · filed 2025-10-03 · Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles · 25STCV29062

    “… Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case Number: 25STCV29062, Filed on October 3, 2025.”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3
  • Einstein Bros. Bagels Franchise Corporation v. Waleed Mansour, Superwings, Inc., and Bagel Genius, Inc.

    pending

    Brought against a franchisee · filed 2025-10-03 · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · 1:25-cv- 03113

    “… United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case Number: 1:25-cv- 03113, Filed on October 3, 2025.”Page 14 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

Status not stated in the filing (1)

  • Einstein Bros. Bagel Franchise Corporation and Einstein and Noah Corporation v. J.F.C Management Holdings, LLC, and Ramona D. Hall

    Brought by the franchisor · filed 2024-12-02 · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · 24-cv-03344-CNS-SBP

    “… United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case Number: 24-cv-03344-CNS-SBP, Filed on December 2, 2024.”Page 15 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?