Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2026 filing

Duck Donuts litigation history

What Duck Donuts disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
1
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2026
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Consent Order (Jan 2022) resolving claims of California Franchise Investment Law violations (Google click ads; offering franchise while Disclosure Document not registered); Duck Donuts paid a $5,000 penalty without admitting fault.

Item 3 (litigation) · 1 matter disclosed

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Concluded (1)

  • In the Matter of the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation v. Duck Donuts Holdings, LLC

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · filed 2022-01-26 · State of California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation

    “… (State of California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation).”Page 11 of the 2026 FDD, Item 3

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?