Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing

Dog Training Elite litigation history

What Dog Training Elite disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.

Items 3 (litigation) & 4 (bankruptcy) at a glance

What the filing discloses

Cases disclosed
4
Item 3, as counted in the filing
Largest settlement, franchisor's own cases
None stated
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
Filing year
2025
Disclosures cover the prior ten years

Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Item 3: litigation

1 arbitration among members/officers settled and dismissed with prejudice Oct 2025. 3 franchisor-initiated suits: 2 against Condorman/Neal Mestas (dismissed 2025), 1 against Ballard/Sbibos (pending) for breach of contract and failure to pay royalties.

Item 3 (litigation) · 4 matters disclosed · 1 pending listed

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Pending (1)

  • Dog Training Elite Franchising, LLC v. Sarah Jean Ballard, Robert Loran Ballard, and Sbibos, LTD

    pending

    Brought against a franchisee · filed 2024-07-26 · Utah federal district court · 2:24-cv-00526

    “… (Utah federal district court.”Page 11 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

Concluded (3)

  • Dog Training Elite Franchising, LLC v. Condorman, Inc. and Neal Mestas

    dismissed

    Brought against a franchisee · filed 2024-07-26 · U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · 2:24-cv-01861

    “… (U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.”Page 11 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • Dog Training Elite Franchising, LLC v. Condorman, Inc. and Neal Mestas

    dismissed

    Brought against a franchisee · filed 2024-08-21 · U.S. District Court for the District of Utah · 240905831

    “… (U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. Filed August 21, 2024, Case No. 240905831).”Page 11 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
  • Rucker Canine LLC, Fund Enterprises, L.L.C. vs. John Mestas, Neal Mestas, Arrow Kennels, Inc., DTE Demo Dog LLC and Dog Training Elite Franchising LLC

    settled

    filed 2024-09-10 · Arbitration (forum not named) · 01-24-0007-6758

    “… (Filed September 10, 2024, Arbitration Case number 01-24-0007-6758).”Page 10 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome: “In October 2025, the arbitrator dismissed the case with prejudice.”

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

Disclosure signals that moved the score

How this shows up in the verdict

  • Internal litigation involving breach of fiduciary duty and fund misappropriation suggests governance instability at franchisor level
  • Three franchisor-initiated lawsuits indicate enforcement challenges and potential franchisee compliance/profitability issues

The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.

Before you weigh a lawsuit

How to read Item 3

A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.

Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:

  • Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
  • Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
  • Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?