Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

4 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Kilwins logoAStrongest tier
Kilwins
Quick-Service Restaurants
Remove
Nap Tea logoFWeakest tier
Nap Tea
Quick-Service Restaurants
Remove
Amorino logoCAverage
Amorino
Quick-Service Restaurants
Remove
Jamba logoAStrongest tier
Jamba
Quick-Service Restaurants
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$513K – $880K
$624K – $777K
$439K – $981K
$481K – $941K
Liquid capital
$8K – $75K
$30K – $60K
$65K – $125K
$15K – $43K
Franchise fee
$40K
$300K
$30K
$36K
Royalty rate
5.0%
4.0%
N/A
6.0%
Ad fund rate
3.0%
N/A
3.0%
3.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$933K
N/A
$1.1M
$675K
Median gross sales
$802K
N/A
$970K
$625K
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
N/A
$128K
N/A
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
P&L Bottom Line
Not classified
Risk
Rating
AStrongest tier
FWeakest tier
CAverage
AStrongest tier
Verdict score
75 / 100
26 / 100
46 / 100
75 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
3.6%
N/A
0.0%
3.6%
SBA loans on record
120
N/A
9
28
Scale
Total units
172
0
22
710
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
3.0%
N/A
4.5%
6.5%
Contract
Initial term (years)
10
5
10
20
Renewal term (years)
10
5
5
20
Initial training (hrs)
200
80
60
105
Contacts
Franchisee phones
21
2
11
100

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →