Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Amorino logo

Amorino Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsDEFranchising since 2021
BAbove averageAbove average46/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$439K – $981K
Disclosed sales
$1.1M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (9)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00131FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%Pre-opening
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Amorino is a dessert franchise serving premium Italian gelato shaped into signature flower-petal cones, plus pastries and coffee. Franchisees run the shops, managing gelato prep, staffing, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Amorino franchise requires a total initial investment of $439K – $981K, including a $30K franchise fee. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.1M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$439K – $981K
69th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Net sales21st pct Service Resta…
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
22
50th pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$439K – $981K
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$30K – $30K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$65K – $125K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.1M
Median $975K
above median ↑, better than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 5.5%
Ongoing Fees
33.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (9)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 9 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
22 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $439K – $981K including a $30K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.1M/year (median $970K), with an estimated 10% cash-on-cash return (based on Net Income $127,849 11.5%).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 46/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +4 franchised outlets in the latest year (4 opened, 0 closed); 6 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 37.5% CAGR over 3 years with 22 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
CPUSA, LLC
Parent company
Amorino USA Corp.
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
-18° SAS (French company, owned by CPH, SAS)
Predecessor
Minus Zero4 F, LLC (offered Amorino franchises Dec 2012 – early 2019)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Erwan De Guichen
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, Delaware 19808
Auditor
WBL CPAs + Advisors
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$37K
vs $19K prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
Erwan De Guichen
Headquarters
DE
Founded
2020
FDD year
2025
States available
10

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 46% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$439K – $981KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$30,000Verified — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fund3.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$65K – $125K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown13 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee (Traditional Store)$30K$30K
Architect's Fees, Engineer's Fees, Permits (Traditional Store)$15K$45K
Legal Fees (Traditional Store)$3K$12K
Real Property: Lease Security Deposit and Utility Deposits (Traditional Store)$5K$45K
Leasehold Improvements: Construction, Remodeling, Alterations and Decorating (Traditional Store)$140K$400K
Furniture, Equipment, Casework, and Restaurant Supplies (Traditional Store)$125K$195K
Freight, Duties, Storage and Delivery (Traditional Store)$10K$15K
P.O.S. Systems (Traditional Store)$2K$3K
Inventory to begin Operating (Traditional Store)$20K$70K
Signage (Traditional Store)$15K$30K
Store Opening Promotional Fee (Traditional Store)$5K$5K
Store Opening Assistance / Initial Training (Traditional Store)$4K$7K
Additional Funds - 3 Months (Traditional Store)$65K$125K
Total initial investment$439K$981K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$439K – $981K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$65K – $125K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$30K – $30K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
Currently $0 (no royalty charged); franchisor marks up pr…
Ad fund
3.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
33.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
10.1 yrs
From FDD / Item 19

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Amorino: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Marketing / ad fund3.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$30
Training fee$7K
Transfer fee$1K
Renewal fee$25
Inventory (initial)$20K – $70K
Total fee load33.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

At 33.0% total fee load, roughly $368K per year goes to the franchisor before you pay a single operating expense.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 14% above the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$1.1M

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 68 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$970KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 68 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typenet sales
Sample size18 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Amorino until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$805K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

FDD-reported earnings

The FDD reports $128K as Net Income $127,849 11.5%. This is a disclosed figure, not our estimate — we publish no modelled profit for Amorino.

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Amorino unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,115,185 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $439K–$981K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $65K–$125K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$805K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$1.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$970K
Avg net income $127,849 11.5%
$128K
Reported as Net Income $127,849 11.5% in FDD Item 19
Cash-on-cash
9.9%
Based on Net Income $127,849 11.5% / investment midpoint

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
net sales
Sample size
18 outlets
vs category median 19
Range (low → high)
$545K→$2.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 68 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
9 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank21th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank69th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank
No comparison data
Unit count rank50th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank57th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 149 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.1M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.6x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 33.0% — above the Quick-Service Restaurants median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 9/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 37.5% CAGR over 3 years across 22 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Multi-unit rate

Only 7% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Amorino Compares

Metric
Amorino
Category median
vs median
Investment
$710K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.1M
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
22
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units22Verified — printed on page 73 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+37.5% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
22
Opened
4
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
7.1%
Net growth (3-yr)
+37.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+37.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
6
0.27 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
10
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
16
Franchised units
2023
18+2
Franchised units
2024
22+4
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 4 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

5 current owners across 4 states.

  • TX 2
  • DE 1
  • IL 1
  • MA 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 9 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
9
Loan volume
$3.5M
Median loan
$386K
average
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (9)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 9 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (9)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (9)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
6
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (9)
Verdict score46/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average46Verdict score 46/100

Amorino presents moderate-to-caution risk due to recent litigation alleging fraud, unverified financial claims, modest growth on small unit base, and high investment relative to reported returns.

High confidence±6 pts
4052

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

One case: Capernaum Capital LLC v. Minus Zero4 F LLC et al. (USDC E.D. La., Case No. 22-5271, filed Dec 13 2022). Franchisee alleged rescission, fraud, breach of contract. Settled Feb 2023 — franchisee paid Amorino Trading $16,906.06, parties exchanged mutual releases, franchise agreement terminated.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · WBL CPAs + Advisors

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.0MYr 2: $0.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 46 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHLitigation history: December 2022 lawsuit alleging fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract, settled with franchisee paying $16,906 and terminating agreement — suggests potential disclosure or operational issues
  2. 02MINORHigh investment ceiling ($980,500) combined with modest average net income ($127,849) yields concerning 7.6-year payback period at upper range, increasing financial risk exposure
  3. 03MEDModest unit growth (22.2% YoY) on small base (22 units) indicates early-stage franchise system with limited operating history and scale; growth rate may not be sustainable
  4. 04MINORNo royalty model creates unclear franchisor revenue stream and potential incentive misalignment between franchisor support and franchisee success
  5. 05MINORItem 19 (financial performance representation) absence prevents verification of claimed average revenue/net income figures across entire franchisee population

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 149 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 33.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training60 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Online sales rightsℹGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ3 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice20 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationNew York County, New York
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawDelaware
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

One case: Capernaum Capital LLC v. Minus Zero4 F LLC et al. (USDC E.D. La., Case No. 22-5271, filed Dec 13 2022). Franchisee alleged rescission, fraud, breach of contract. Settled Feb 2023 — franchisee paid Amorino Trading $16,906.06, parties exchanged mutual releases, franchise agreement terminated.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
22 hrs
On-the-job training
38 hrs
Training location
Paris, France (10 days initial) + franchisee's store location (5 days on-site)
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
45 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
9 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
mutual agreement / franchisor approval
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Square
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Square

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

5 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 5 contacts · $49
Free preview
(469) 534-••••TX
Unlock all 5 contacts
(346) 319-••••TX
(617) 953-••••MA
(469) 500-••••DE
(331) 806-••••IL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Amorino franchise?

The total investment to open a Amorino franchise ranges from $439K – $981K, with an initial franchise fee of $30K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Amorino franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Amorino FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.1M. The median is $970K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Amorino?

Amorino is franchised by CPUSA, LLC. Its parent company is Amorino USA Corp.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is -18° SAS (French company, owned by CPH, SAS). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Amorino FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Amorino FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Amorino's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Amorino (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Amorino franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Amorino has 22 total units in the United States, including 22 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 4 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Amorino a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Amorino as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 46 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Amorino, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.