Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

Compare

2 brands side-by-side

Compare up to 4 brands side by side

indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.

How winners are chosen

Lower is better for investment, liquid capital, franchise fee, royalty and ad-fund rates, SBA charge-off rate, and owner turnover.

Higher is better for disclosed revenue and owner earnings, verdict score, total units, net unit growth, and franchisee contacts. For the letter grade, A ranks highest.

A row is highlighted only when one brand clearly leads. Ties are never highlighted, and missing data never counts as a win. Some rows (earnings-metric type, loan counts, contract terms) are informational and have no winner.

Download PDF

Focus by buyer type

Brand
Pillar To Post logoBAbove average
Pillar To Post
Home Services
Remove
Clozetivity logoCAverage
Clozetivity
Home Services
Remove
Vitals
Investment range
$103K – $134K
$82K – $158K
Liquid capital
$10K – $20K
$15K – $30K
Franchise fee
$59K
$39K
Royalty rate
7.0%
N/A
Ad fund rate
4.0%
2.0%
Performance
Avg gross sales
$308K
N/A
Median gross sales
$193K
N/A
Avg owner earnings
Metric varies by brand. Check type below
N/A
N/A
Earnings metric
Not classified
Not classified
Risk
Rating
BAbove average
CAverage
Verdict score
48 / 100
43 / 100
SBA charge-off rate
18.5%
N/A
SBA loans on record
44
N/A
Scale
Total units
382
13
Net change (latest yr)
N/A
N/A
Turnover rate
11.0%
0.0%
Contract
Initial term (years)
5
10
Renewal term (years)
5
5
Initial training (hrs)
378
25
Contacts
Franchisee phones
88
25

Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?

Read the Pillar To Post vs Clozetivity editorial comparison →

Need franchisee contacts for these brands?

Save with a contact bundle →