Pillar To Post Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $103K – $134K
- Disclosed sales
- $308K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 18.5%
- on 44 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Pillar To Post is a home-inspection franchise providing structural, mechanical, and safety inspections for homebuyers, sellers, and agents. Franchisees run an inspection business scheduling jobs, performing on-site evaluations, and delivering reports, often built on realtor referrals.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Pillar To Post franchise requires a total initial investment of $103K – $134K, including a $59K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $308K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 18.5% charge-off rate across 44 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $103K – $134K
- 35th pct Home Services
- Avg gross sales
- $308K
- 4th pct Home Services
- Royalty
- 7.0%
- 48th pct Home Services
- Units
- 382
- 84th pct Home Services
- SBA charge-off
- 18.5%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $103K – $134K including a $59K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $308K/year (median $193K).
- RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 48/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 18.5% across 44 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHNegative: net -30 franchised outlets in the latest year (12 opened, 42 closed) (Item 20).
- DECLINESystem contracting at -19.6% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- PILLAR TO POST, INC.
- Parent company
- FS Brands, Inc.
- FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
- Ultimate parent
- FirstService Corporation
- CEO title
- President and Chief Executive Officer
- Charles Furlough
- Incorporated in
- DE
- HQ
- 14502 North Dale Mabry Hwy., Suite 200, Tampa, FL 33618
- Auditor
- PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $888.6M
- vs $850.4M prior year
Same owner · FDD Item 1
4 other brands on this site name FirstService Corporation as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.
Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.
Overview
About
- CEO
- Charles Furlough
- Headquarters
- FL
- Founded
- 1994
- FDD year
- 2026
- States available
- 43
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 30% below the typical home services franchise.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7
FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing
Initial investment breakdown
| Cost component | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Initial franchise fee | $59K | $59K |
| Working capital (3–6 mo) | $10K | $20K |
| Equipment, build-out, other | $34K | $56K |
| Total initial investment | $103K | $134K |
Source: Pillar To Post 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $103K – $134K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $10K – $20K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $59K – $59K
- Middle of category vs category
- Royalty
- 7.0%
- typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 4.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 16.5%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 7.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 4.0% of gross sales |
| Technology fee | $5 |
| Transfer fee | $4K |
| Renewal fee | $3K |
| Total fee load | 16.5% of rev |
At 16.5% total fee load, roughly $51K per year goes to the franchisor before you pay a single operating expense.
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 48% below the home services norm.
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Pillar To Post until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$133K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Pillar To Post unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD
Financial Performance
- Avg gross sales
- $308K
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $193K
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- Average Sales across 297 franchisee-owned units open the entire 2025 calendar year - gross sales ranged $32,720 to $4,174,270, 85 units (29%) at or above the average and 149 (50%) at or above the $192,612 median. Excludes 25 units: 4 opened during the year, 17 terminated or ceased, 4 that did not report gross sales despite a contractual obligation
- Sample size
- 297 outlets
- vs category median 32 · large
- Range (low → high)
- $33K→$4.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 60 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2025
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2026
- Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Compared against 319 Home Services brands
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $308K/year in gross sales. Median is $193K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.6x.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 16.5% — above the Home Services median of 8.0%.
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System contracting at -19.6% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Home Services medians
How Pillar To Post Compares
Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 382
- Opened
- 12
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 42
- Turnover rate
- 11.0%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -19.6%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -19.6%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Signed, not yet open
- 0
- 0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 20
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 10 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
88 current owners across 10 states.
- FL 30
- CO 16
- CA 15
- AL 7
- AZ 6
- CT 6
- GA 4
- AR 2
- AK 1
- TX 1
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 44
- Loan volume
- $5.2M
- Median loan
- $51K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 18.5%
- on 44 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 81.5%
- 5-yr charge-off
- 25.0%
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 32
- Defaults
- 5
- Typical loan rate
- 8.1%
- avg rate to borrowers
- Franchised industry avg
- 23.9%
- brand beats franchise avg ↓
- Jobs supported
- 151
- 3.0 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 13%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 38% went to startups / new businesses, 62% to established operators
Franchise vs independent — in building inspection services, franchised businesses charge off at 23.9% vs 19.1% for independents — franchising is associated with 25% higher SBA default risk in this category.
Vintage analysis
Pillar To Post charge-off rate by loan vintage
Top lenders financing Pillar To Post franchisees
Showing 3 of 32 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Pillar To Post from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 6.6%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 75%
- Avg interest rate
- 8.12%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $66K
- Lender concentration
- 12.5%
- Job velocity
- 3.0 per $100K
- Startup risk premium
- -40.0pp
- NAICS benchmark
- 19.2%
- NAICS 541350
- Jobs supported
- 151
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 13% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Midwest Savings Bank National Association | 5 | $482K | 0.0% |
| 2 | PNC Bank, National Association | 2 | $84K | 0.0% |
| 3 | Valley National Bank | 2 | $72K | 50.0% |
| 4 | Bank of America, National Association | 2 | $105K | 0.0% |
| 5 | Simmons Bank | 2 | $300K | 100.0% |
| 6 | Readycap Lending, LLC | 2 | $239K | N/A |
| 7 | The Huntington National Bank | 2 | $55K | 0.0% |
| 8 | Fifth Third Bank | 1 | $35K | 0.0% |
| 9 | NBT Bank, National Association | 1 | $48K | 0.0% |
| 10 | TD Bank, National Association | 1 | $26K | 0.0% |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| INIndiana | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| FLFlorida | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MIMichigan | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| PAPennsylvania | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| TNTennessee | 3 | 2 | 100.0% |
| TXTexas | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| CACalifornia | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NJNew Jersey | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| OHOhio | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| WAWashington | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 18.5% — 15% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Declining unit count, undisclosed net income, unprotected territories, and litigation history create a CAUTION-to-HIGH RISK profile that demands deep validation before investment.
Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
1 prior action as plaintiff (Pillar To Post v. MS Home Inspections LLC - breach of franchise agreement, trademark infringement; settled March 2026, $25,000 award). 1 prior action as defendant (KJ Loughery Inc. v. Pillar To Post - wrongful non-renewal master franchise; settled February 2018, franchisor purchased master franchises in PA and NJ).
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Audited statements are the consolidated financials of the parent/guarantor FS Brands, Inc. (Pillar To Post, Inc. is a subsidiary); no standalone franchisor statements provided. Expressed in whole US dollars. FY2025 revenue $888,597,127 (royalties $103,293,399; franchise fees $9,409,728; merchandise sales $672,125,729; services and other $103,768,271). Net worth = common stockholders' equity $286,219,085 (excludes $81,104,976 redeemable non-controlling interests shown as mezzanine; assets $655,396,303 = liabilities $288,072,242 + NCI $81,104,976 + equity $286,219,085). Net income for year $60,831,791 (attributable to common stockholders $54,766,222).
ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: Yes
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
Score breakdown · what drove the 48 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORUnit count declining 7.3% YoY (382 units) — shrinking franchise system indicates market saturation or franchisee dissatisfaction
- 02MINORNo average net income disclosure — opacity around profitability makes ROI assessment impossible; cannot verify if $307,908 avg revenue translates to viable income
- 03HIGHTwo litigation cases including master franchisee dispute — suggests franchisor-franchisee relationship strain and potential disputes over performance standards and renewal terms
- 04MEDHigh initial investment ($102,690–$134,290) + 7% royalties with variable monthly minimums ($0–$2,328) creates unpredictable cost structure relative to undisclosed profitability
- 05MINORNo protected territory — franchisee competes with other Pillar To Post locations and master franchisees in same area; risk of encroachment and channel conflict
- 06MINOR5-year term with no stated renewal protections — master franchisee litigation over non-renewal signals potential franchise termination/non-renewal risks
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 16.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 5 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 5 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 5 |
| Territory type | Protected territory |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Not allowed |
| Owner-operator | Required |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 2 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Arbitration location | Tampa, Florida |
| Jury trial waiver | No |
| Governing law | FL |
| Litigation count | 2 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
1 prior action as plaintiff (Pillar To Post v. MS Home Inspections LLC - breach of franchise agreement, trademark infringement; settled March 2026, $25,000 award). 1 prior action as defendant (KJ Loughery Inc. v. Pillar To Post - wrongful non-renewal master franchise; settled February 2018, franchisor purchased master franchises in PA and NJ).
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 176 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 202 hrs
- Training location
- Franchisee's home office (live virtual training environment)
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Time to open
- 4 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- Franchisee selects within territory subject to franchisor approval; home-based operation recommended
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- OnePoint
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: OnePoint
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
88 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Pillar To Post franchise?
The total investment to open a Pillar To Post franchise ranges from $103K – $134K, with an initial franchise fee of $59K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Pillar To Post franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Pillar To Post FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $308K. The median is $193K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Pillar To Post?
Pillar To Post is franchised by PILLAR TO POST, INC.. Its parent company is FS Brands, Inc.. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is FirstService Corporation. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Pillar To Post FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Pillar To Post FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Pillar To Post's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Pillar To Post has a charge-off rate of 18.5% across 44 loans, meaning 18.5% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Pillar To Post franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Pillar To Post has 382 total units in the United States, including 382 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 12 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Pillar To Post a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Pillar To Post as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 48 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Pillar To Post, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Home Services franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.